Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Marcal, 388 So. 2d 656.
- State of Louisiana Versus T.E. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
- State of Louisiana v. Robert H. Miller, III A/K/A Robert Miller, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
- State of Louisiana v. Jason Ray Craft La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
- State Of Louisiana v. Ronald Robinson, Et Al. La. 2021
-
State of Louisiana Versus John Spears
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
This Court found that the defendant was precluded from raising this error on appeal because the defense counsel failed to contemporaneously object to the trial court’s ruling, and he acquiesced when the trial judge told him to rephrase the question and sustained the State’s objection; (La.
-
State of Louisiana v. Santiago Alonso Gonzalez, Sr. AKA Santiago Alonso Gonzalez AKA Sontiago Gonzalez
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
” appeal dismissed, cert.
-
State v. Gonzalez
249 So. 3d 129
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Marcal , , 662 (La.1980), appeal dismissed, cert.
- State of Louisiana v. Terry James Goodeaux -Aka- Terry Goodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
-
State v. Tucker
170 So. 3d 394
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. King, 2006-2383 (La.4/27/07)
-
State of Louisiana v. Rendrick R. Duke
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
The bill of information read to the jury and for which Defendant had appeared for trial did not inform Defendant of the “nature and cause of the accusation against him in sufficient detail to allow him to prepare for trial, as well as to allow the court to determine the admissibility of the evidence.” (La.
- State of Louisiana v. Kent Dale Simon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
- State v. Simon 62 So. 3d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
- State v. Lewis 28 So. 3d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- State of Louisiana v. Francis Brown La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
- State v. Brown 6 So. 3d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-
State v. King
956 So. 2d 562
La. 2007
(on reh'g) (noting the record contained no evidence that the district attorney himself initiated or decided to proceed with the prosecution of defendant).
- State v. Ceaser 859 So. 2d 639 La. 2003
- Turner v. Ostrowe 828 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- State v. Delandro 818 So. 2d 1011 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- Woods v. Cameco Industries, Inc. 815 So. 2d 370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
-
State v. Givens
776 So. 2d 443
La. 2001
-17 (La.1993); -60 (La.1980) *455 The defendant's argument is that the District Attorney's Office should have been recused because four student practitioners with the Loyola Law Clinic, who had at different times represented the defendant before Mr. Smith enrolled as counsel, graduated from law school and accepted employment wit
- State v. Gilbert 760 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
- State v. Ignot 701 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
- State v. DeJesus 642 So. 2d 854 La. 1994
- State v. Johnson 637 So. 2d 1033 La. 1994
- State v. Bender 598 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
- State v. Baker 582 So. 2d 1320 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- State v. West 561 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
- State v. Clark 558 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- State v. Foster 541 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-
State v. Panepinto
527 So. 2d 505
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Const. art. I, § 13; cert.
-
State v. Gray
526 So. 2d 1268
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
certiorari denied, 451 U.S. 977 , 101 S.Ct.
- State v. Owens 521 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. Burge 515 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- State v. Byrd 491 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- State v. Green 476 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
- State v. Knapper 458 So. 2d 1284 La. 1984
- State v. Benton 453 So. 2d 993 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Stewart 452 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
- State v. Catchings 440 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
-
State v. Gatson
434 So. 2d 1315
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
in which he further averred: "On appeal, this Court's jurisdiction is limited to questions of law; therefore, if there is some evidence proving the essential elements of the crime, no question of law is presented, sufficiency of the evidence being a matter to be decided by the trier of fact.
- State v. Oliney 430 So. 2d 1294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Marcal 430 So. 2d 47 La. 1983
- State v. Wells 429 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- State v. Ruple 426 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Edwards 420 So. 2d 663 La. 1982
- State v. Ennis 414 So. 2d 661 La. 1982
- State v. Vaccaro 411 So. 2d 415 La. 1982
- State v. Thompson 399 So. 2d 1161 La. 1981
- State v. Toomer 395 So. 2d 1320 La. 1981