Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Fisher, 380 So. 2d 1340.

24 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Jhonna D. Leonard La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
  • State v. Hatfield 155 So. 3d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    the State informed the defendant on February 21, 1979 of its intent to offer in evidence an oral confession she had made and on March 8, 1979 of its intent to offer in evidence another oral statement she made.
  • State v. Williams 632 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    approving a one-day recess under similar circumstances.
  • State v. Bourque 636 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    1 Cir.1985), writ denied, "
  • State v. Anseman 607 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Widenhouse 582 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    15:451; , 416 n. 8 (La.1987); State v. *1380 Fisher, , 1343 n. 1 (La.1980); , 1223 n. 2 (La.1979); , 134 n. 2 (La.1978).
  • State v. Mercer 564 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Helaire 496 So. 2d 1322 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    presents a similar fact situation to the instant case.
  • State v. Guidry 476 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Mayberry 457 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Williams 448 So. 2d 659 La. 1984
  • State v. Benoit 440 So. 2d 129 La. 1983
    472 n. 3 (La.1981); , 1342 n. 1 (La.1980).
  • State v. Ruiz 437 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Foster 437 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    State v. Robinson, supra
  • State v. Parrish 434 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    where defendant was notified of one of his several statements on the morning of his trial and was granted a 24-hour continuance.
  • State v. Walker 432 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Vaughn 431 So. 2d 763 La. 1983
    State v. Jones, 408 S.2d, 1285 (La.1982)
  • State v. Shapiro 431 So. 2d 372 La. 1983
  • State v. Yarbrough 418 So. 2d 503 La. 1982
    this court held the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting a defendant's inculpatory statement into evidence where the defendant contended he was not timely informed of the statements and of the State's intention to introduce same in evidence because the State had substantially complied with
  • State v. Beals 410 So. 2d 745 La. 1982
  • State v. Istre 407 So. 2d 1183 La. 1981
    this Court has repeatedly held that: Before a confession may be introduced in evidence, the state has the burden of affirmatively proving that it was free and voluntary and was not made under the influence of fear, duress, intimidation, menaces, inducements or promises.
  • State v. Lindsey 404 So. 2d 466 La. 1981
  • State v. Alpine 404 So. 2d 213 La. 1981
    art. 729.3; where a state investigator uncovered an additional inculpatory statement, the district attorney immediately informed the defense upon coming into possession of it, and we found that defendant was not entitled to a continuance or to a mistrial.
  • State v. Wade 390 So. 2d 1309 La. 1980