Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Fisher, 380 So. 2d 1340.
- State of Louisiana Versus Jhonna D. Leonard La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
-
State v. Hatfield
155 So. 3d 572
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
the State informed the defendant on February 21, 1979 of its intent to offer in evidence an oral confession she had made and on March 8, 1979 of its intent to offer in evidence another oral statement she made.
-
State v. Williams
632 So. 2d 893
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
approving a one-day recess under similar circumstances.
-
State v. Bourque
636 So. 2d 254
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
1 Cir.1985), writ denied, "
- State v. Anseman 607 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
-
State v. Widenhouse
582 So. 2d 1374
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
15:451; , 416 n. 8 (La.1987); State v. *1380 Fisher, , 1343 n. 1 (La.1980); , 1223 n. 2 (La.1979); , 134 n. 2 (La.1978).
- State v. Mercer 564 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
-
State v. Helaire
496 So. 2d 1322
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
presents a similar fact situation to the instant case.
- State v. Guidry 476 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- State v. Mayberry 457 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
- State v. Williams 448 So. 2d 659 La. 1984
-
State v. Benoit
440 So. 2d 129
La. 1983
472 n. 3 (La.1981); , 1342 n. 1 (La.1980).
- State v. Ruiz 437 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
-
State v. Foster
437 So. 2d 309
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Robinson, supra
-
State v. Parrish
434 So. 2d 475
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
where defendant was notified of one of his several statements on the morning of his trial and was granted a 24-hour continuance.
- State v. Walker 432 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
-
State v. Vaughn
431 So. 2d 763
La. 1983
State v. Jones, 408 S.2d, 1285 (La.1982)
- State v. Shapiro 431 So. 2d 372 La. 1983
-
State v. Yarbrough
418 So. 2d 503
La. 1982
this court held the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting a defendant's inculpatory statement into evidence where the defendant contended he was not timely informed of the statements and of the State's intention to introduce same in evidence because the State had substantially complied with
- State v. Beals 410 So. 2d 745 La. 1982
-
State v. Istre
407 So. 2d 1183
La. 1981
this Court has repeatedly held that: Before a confession may be introduced in evidence, the state has the burden of affirmatively proving that it was free and voluntary and was not made under the influence of fear, duress, intimidation, menaces, inducements or promises.
- State v. Lindsey 404 So. 2d 466 La. 1981
-
State v. Alpine
404 So. 2d 213
La. 1981
art. 729.3; where a state investigator uncovered an additional inculpatory statement, the district attorney immediately informed the defense upon coming into possession of it, and we found that defendant was not entitled to a continuance or to a mistrial.
- State v. Wade 390 So. 2d 1309 La. 1980