Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rudloff v. Louisiana Health Services & Indem. Co., 385 So. 2d 767.

31 citing documents.

Ngoc Troung v. Marcus Dewayne Sanders and Old American Indemnity Company La. 2025
Kristen Moon v. Safeway Insurance Company of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
The Supreme Court then looked to National Union’s policy language and determined that “National Union failed to provide coverage in conformity with or in excess of the [Form]” and that “reformation of the policy to conform with the [Form] is appropriate.” Osbon, 632 So.2d at 1161 ( (La.
Richard and Judith Williams v. United States Fire Insurance La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
In determining whether a policy falls under the confines of “health and accident” in Louisiana’s Insurance Code, (on rehearing), for guidance.
Steven Odstrcil v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Odstrcil v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co. 221 So. 3d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Williams v. Louisiana Citizens Fair Plan 91 So. 3d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
On rehearing, opined that statutory penalties are inappropriate when the insurer has a reasonable basis to defend the claim and acts in good-faith reliance on that defense.
Maloney Cinque, L.L.C. v. Pacific Insurance Co. 89 So. 3d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Guillory v. Lee 16 So. 3d 1104 La. 2009
Reed,, 857 So.2d at 1021 ( (on reh’g); and Block v. St.
Washington v. COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY 974 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Reed v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 857 So. 2d 1012 La. 2003
Block v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 742 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Co., Gipson v. Yosemite Ins.
Osbon v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. 632 So. 2d 1158 La. 1994
Carr v. K & B, Inc. 560 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Co., overruled on other grounds by Rudloff v. Louisiana Health Services & Indem., , on rehearing (La.1980).
Distinguished Hargroder v. Protective Life Ins. Co. 556 So. 2d 991 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
In that respect this case is distinguishable from Rudloff v. Louisiana Health Services & Indem., where the insurer did not offer the optional insurance coverage.
Guitreau v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 540 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Breland v. Louisiana Hospital Services, Inc., 468 So.
Medical Arts Pharmacy v. Rabun 517 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Hassen v. Professional Investors Life Insurance Co. 503 So. 2d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Co., Boyle v. Fringe Facts, Inc., (La.App.
Gipson v. Yosemite Ins. Co. 494 So. 2d 1290 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Soileau v. Time Insurance Co. 486 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Health Services & Indem.Co., overruled on other grounds, Neider v. Continental Assur.Co., 213 La.
Matthews v. BUSINESS MEN'S ASSUR. CO. OF AM. 478 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Breland v. Louisiana Hospital Services, Inc. 468 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Posey, 426 So.2d at 709 ; (La.App.
Landry v. Louisiana Hosp. Service, Inc. 449 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Coliseum House, Inc. v. Brock 442 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Rudloff v. Louisiana Health Services & Indemnity Co., on rehearing (1980).
Joubert v. Business Insurance Life of America 415 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
wherein our Supreme Court, on rehearing, our court in Lucito v. Louisiana Hospital Service, Inc., d/b/a Blue Cross of Louisiana, (La.App.
Burke v. Occidental Life Ins. Co. of Cal. 416 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Thompson v. Business Ins. Life of America 413 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
The latest expression of the Louisiana Supreme Court with respect to the characterization of insurance contracts providing coverage solely for hospitalization and medical expenses is found in Rudloff v. Louisiana Health Services & Indemnity Company, wherein the court, on rehearing, specifically overruled its own holding in Tabb v. Louisiana Health Services & Indemnity Company
Conner v. Business Insurance Life of America 414 So. 2d 1340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Health Services and Indemnity Co., held on rehearing that a policy providing benefits for hospital and medical care is “health and accident” insurance under Louisiana law.
Boyle v. Fringe Facts, Inc. 414 So. 2d 1333 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Health Services and Indemnity Co., has specifically held that a policy providing for hospital and medical care is a health and accident policy.
Peters v. LIFE GENERAL SEC. INS. CO. 400 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
However, the Tabb case has been reversed as to that holding in Rudloff v. Louisiana Health Services & Indem., and defendant's argument is without merit.
Poche v. LOUISIANA HEALTH SERVICES & INDEM. CO. 391 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
However, the more recent expression of the Louisiana Supreme Court, Rudloff v. Louisiana Health Services & Indem., overrules Tabb and holds that a policy which provides benefits for hospital and medical care is a health policy.
Lucito v. Louisiana Hospital Service, Inc. 392 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
However, overruled Tabb in that it held such a Blue Cross policy is classified as a "Health and Accident" policy and is within the scope of La.R.S.