Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Nall, 379 So. 2d 731.

59 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Jeremy Andre Sinceno La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Nancy Rogers A/K/A Nancy Lynn Rogers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
“A plea bargain is a contract between the state and one accused of a crime.”
State Of Louisiana v. David Brown La. 2022
State v. Westley 263 So. 3d 888 La. 2019
State v. Nall , , 733 (La.
State v. Collins 263 So. 3d 878 La. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Joe Lewis, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Furthermore, wherein the issue was whether the State was bound to a plea agreement when its agreement was based on false premises presented by the defendant.
State of Louisiana v. Joe Lewis, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Furthermore, wherein the issue was whether the State was bound to a plea agreement when its 3 We note that Rule 3.1 has since been amended to specifically state that “Any judge of the court may accept a plea in any felony or misdemeanor case though not allotted to the division of the judge accepting th
State v. Lewis 261 So. 3d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Furthermore, the State cites State v. Nall , wherein the issue was whether the State was bound to a plea agreement when its agreement was based on false premises presented by the defendant.
State v. Lewis 261 So. 3d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Furthermore, the State cites State v. Nall , wherein the issue was whether the State was bound to a plea agreement when its agreement was based on false premises presented by the defendant.
State v. Foster 224 So. 3d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Woodrow Karey, Jr., A/K/A Woodrow Karey, II La. 2017
State v. Allah 216 So. 3d 162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Woodrow Karey, Jr. AKA Woodrow Karey, II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. Karey 180 So. 3d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Birgans 57 So. 3d 478 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
in which the supreme court stated it relied on contract principles to reach a reasoning that a plea bargain is a contract between the state and one accused of a crime.
State v. WAFFER 47 So. 3d 533 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Cheatham, 44,247 (La.App.
State v. Holden 44 So. 3d 288 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Cheatham, 44,247 (La.App.
State v. Shelton 26 So. 3d 745 La. 2010
State v. Roberts 973 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
[7] See State v. Louis, 94-0761 (La.11/30/94), ( ).
State v. Guillory 957 So. 2d 132 La. 2007
because of the non-performance of the plea bargain (or the impossibility of the state to perform it) by virtue of which the plea was obtained."); (failure of cause justifies setting aside guilty plea); State v. Floyd, 06-0657 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Fay v. Perez, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Perez 939 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Wynne 926 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
See State v. Peyrefitte, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/15/04), ; (1980); State v. Adams, 2004-77 (La.App.
State v. Lewis 930 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Givens, 99-3518, p. 14 (La.1/17/01), ; State v. Louis, 94-0761, p. 7 (La.11/30/94)
State of Louisiana v. Steven R. Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Thomas 924 So. 2d 1146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Peyrefitte 885 So. 2d 530 La. 2004
See Dyer v. State, 34 P.3d 652 653-54 (Okla.Crim.App.2001) (distinguishing Adamson because "[t]he state merely stated that [defendant] could then be charged with perjury" if he breached his plea bargain, and *531 "[n]o other possible results of a breach were discussed."); (a defendant's unilateral breach of a plea bargain may constitute "cause" for setting aside his agreement with the state and returning the parties to their pre-plea positions in cases in which he or she has not yet been sentenc
State v. Adams 884 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
See State v. Louis, 94-0761, p. 7 (La.11/30/94), ( ).
State of Louisiana v. Corey Marquee Adams, Whitney Batiste, and Horatio Adams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
See State v. Louis, 94-0761, p. 7 (La.11/30/94), ( State 3 v. Lewis, ).
State v. Roberts 822 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Canada 838 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Givens 776 So. 2d 443 La. 2001
See State v. Louis, 94-0761, p. 7 (La.11/30/94), ( (La.
State v. Shipp 754 So. 2d 1068 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Anthony 735 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Hennis 734 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Kelly 704 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State v. Louis, 94-0761 (La.11/30/94), ; , (La.1980).
State v. Edmondson 699 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Planco 692 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
State v. Louis, 94-0761 (La.11/30/94); .
State v. Johnson 687 So. 2d 524 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Fifteen Thousand Four Hundred Thirty-One Dollars & Other Property 670 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Rice 648 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Louis 645 So. 2d 1144 La. 1994
State v. Parker 625 So. 2d 1364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
In support of this proposition
State v. Gross 621 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
after defendant’s attorney represented the “true facts” to the district attorney, a plea agreement was perfected.
State v. Cinel 619 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
In so finding, the Court likened the agreement to a contract, where similar reasoning was applied to a plea bargain agreement.
State v. Pierre 614 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Hankerson 604 So. 2d 1330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Analogizing the plea negotiations to a civil contract (), the Court concluded that the agreement was void because both parties apparently were mistaken as to what was to be exchanged in the contract; and, since the defendant had provided the inculpatory statements in the belief that the evidence could not be used against him, the statements were not "voluntary" o
Lewis v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety & Corrections 602 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Further, where the supreme court voided a plea bargain under the principles of civil law obligation because of defendant’s misrepre *76 sentation as to what his testimony would be.
State v. Hankerson 604 So. 2d 1323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Analogizing the plea negotiations to a civil contract (), the Court concluded that the agreement was void because both parties apparently were mistaken as to what was to be exchanged in the contract; and, since the defendant had provided the inculpatory statements in the belief that the evidence could not be used against him, the statements were not "voluntary" o
State v. Waguespack 589 So. 2d 1079 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991