Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. McDonald, 387 So. 2d 1116.

27 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Andre V. Griffin La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Quanittia Dennie (In Re: Michelle A. Charles Comtempt Proceedings) La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
State in the Intrest of T. H. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State ex rel. T.H. 140 So. 3d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Jackson 714 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Johnson 704 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Jackson 707 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Caldwell 679 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Melerine, 236 La.
State v. Hayes 585 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Joseph 573 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Walker 567 So. 2d 581 La. 1990
1232 , 51 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977), the intermediate court reasoned that defendant's right to counsel had not attached in February, 1987 because adversarial proceedings had not yet been initiated.
State v. Walker 539 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
1232 , 51 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977)
State v. Joe 502 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Ford 489 So. 2d 1250 La. 1986
State v. Bonnette 487 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: “When introduced in presentation of the state’s case in chief, inconsistent statements, whether inculpatory or exculpatory, are not subject to procedural rules governing impeachment of witnesses.
State v. McFadden 476 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Jones 474 So. 2d 919 La. 1985
State v. Arnold 466 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Boudreaux 454 So. 2d 1293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
the necessity of introducing the transcript because the tape could not be found was satisfactorily explained.
State v. Edwards 440 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Myers 438 So. 2d 1332 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Davis 431 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Ferdinand 465 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Mattio, 212 La.
State v. Simmons 414 So. 2d 705 La. 1982
State v. West 408 So. 2d 1302 La. 1982
State v. Naas 409 So. 2d 535 La. 1981
State v. Spell 399 So. 2d 551 La. 1981
that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying a motion for a new trial based upon the recantation of trial testimony by a key witness.