Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. McIntyre, 381 So. 2d 408.
-
State of Louisiana v. Tyler N. Derochowski
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
(“The court did not force the jurors to choose between two inferences but merely stated that a jury must either consider that evidence introduced is probative of the defendant’s guilt or that it is not.”).
- State Of Louisiana v. Oderra Benitez Holmes La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
-
State of Louisiana v. Gerald Samuel
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
The focus of Defendant’s objection was the hearsay statement by Ms. Samuel that the victim “did say it was her father.” The Louisiana Supreme Court has long held that, “even if testimony is inadmissible hearsay, if it is merely cumulative or corroborative of other testimony adduced at trial, then the admission of the hearsay is harmless.” cert.
- State Of Louisiana v. Michael Damonte Diggs La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
- State of Louisiana v. Trae Williams La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
- State of Louisiana v. Frin Wayne Coward La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
-
State v. Daniels
262 So. 3d 356
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 10/2/13), , 625 (quoting State v. McIntyre , , 411 (La.
-
State v. Wells
191 So. 3d 1127
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
(“The court did not force the jurors to choose between two inferences but merely stated that a jury must either.consider that evidence introduced is .
- State 188 So. 3d 1116 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
-
State v. Green
164 So. 3d 331
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Lewis, supra; (La.
-
State v. Hamdalla
126 So. 3d 619
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
The Louisiana Supreme Court has held that, “even if testimony is inadmissible hearsay, if it is merely cumulative or corroborative of other testimony adduced at trial, then the admission of the hearsay is harmless.”
- State v. Lewis 110 So. 3d 644 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
- State of Louisiana v. M S La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
- State v. Richardson 71 So. 3d 492 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
- State v. Garner 47 So. 3d 584 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
- State v. Cooper 42 So. 3d 460 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
-
State v. Griffin
30 So. 3d 1039
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
cert denied, McIntyre v. Louisiana, 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct.
- State v. Williams 28 So. 3d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-
State of Louisiana v. Louis Hayes, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
” As the notes at issue were merely cumulative or corroborative of the testimony of S.M.
- State v. Kennedy 957 So. 2d 757 La. 2007
- State v. Dupree 950 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
- State v. Martin 913 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
- State v. Echols 907 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
- State v. Magee 916 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
- State of Louisiana v. Jim Howard, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
- State v. Howard 888 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
- State v. Smith 864 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
-
State v. Wallace
862 So. 2d 286
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
certiorari denied McIntyre v. Louisiana, 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct.
- Scott v. American Tobacco Co. 795 So. 2d 1176 La. 2001
- State v. Hattaway 674 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
- State v. Pratt 671 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
- State v. Fairley 645 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
- State v. Hamilton 594 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
- State v. Moseley 587 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- State v. Otis 586 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
-
State v. Widenhouse
582 So. 2d 1374
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
See e.g. State v. Ellwest Stereo Theaters, Inc.
-
State v. White
574 So. 2d 561
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
1981); neither the trial court nor the state rehabilitated Mr. Lyons.
- State v. Young 569 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- State v. Honeyman 565 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
- State v. Hall 549 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- State v. White 544 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
- State v. Rexrode 536 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
-
State v. Williams
514 So. 2d 573
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
However, Dr. Chadha’s testimony was entirely consistent with the victim’s and served merely to corroborate that testimony so that its admission constituted harmless error.
- State v. Parker 506 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
-
State v. Clark
499 So. 2d 332
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
certiorari denied McIntyre v. Louisiana, 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct.
- Seals v. Pittman 499 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- State v. Roux 487 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
- Simar v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. 483 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- State v. Holbrook 476 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- State v. Dufrene 461 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984