DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Wright, 384 So. 2d 399.

64 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Alvin Joseph Adams La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
  • State of Louisiana Versus Andre A. Bradley La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
  • State Of Louisiana v. Walter Terell Fisher, Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
  • State of Louisiana v. Will Antonio Celestine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    See also State v. Wright, []; -88 (La.1974).
  • State v. Acevedo 273 So. 3d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    6/21/02), , 520 (citing State v. Wright , , 401 (La.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Marvin S. Acevedo La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
  • State of Louisiana v. Katron v. Richard A/K/A Katron Richard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
  • State v. Katron 265 So. 3d 1058 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    State v. Wright , , 401 (La.1980).
  • State of Louisiana v. Jacob Purvis AKA Jacob Dewayne Purvis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
  • State v. Purvis 244 So. 3d 496 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    State v. Wright , , 401 (La.1980) ; State v. Gros , 205 La.
  • State Ex Rel. John Esteen v. State of Louisiana 239 So. 3d 233 La. 2018
  • State of Louisiana v. Sean Holloway 217 So. 3d 343 La. 2016
  • State of Louisiana v. Therand Guy Thacker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Thacker 187 So. 3d 552 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Thompson 189 So. 3d 1139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State of Louisiana v. Donny R. Morgan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • State v. Morgan 164 So. 3d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State v. Wilt 170 So. 3d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02); ( -131 (La.1983), respectively).
  • State of Louisiana v. Therand Guy Thacker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • State v. Thacker 157 So. 3d 798 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • Paul Massey v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections 149 So. 3d 780 La. 2014
    State v. Hyde, 07-1314, p. 1 (La.11/21/07), ; | State v. Sugasti, 01-3407, p. 4 (La.6/21/02), ; State v. Gros, 205 La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Therand Guy Thacker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Boudreaux 131 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Jones 125 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    In State v. Dick, 06-2223 (La.1/26/07), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated "that the law in effect at the time of the commission of the offense is determinative of the penalty which the accused must suffer, and that a defendant must be sentenced according to the sentencing provisions in effect at the time of the commission of the offense.
  • State v. Dickerson 159 So. 3d 478 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Surry 121 So. 3d 804 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Hyde 968 So. 2d 726 La. 2007
    See, e.g., State v. Sugasti, 01-3407, p. 4 (La.6/21/02)
  • State of Louisiana v. James Oliver McKeehan, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    We acknowledge Louisiana’s prior case law on the subject has adhered to the rule that “the law in effect at the time of the commission of the offense is determinative of the penalty which the convicted accused must suffer.” see also, accord, (Imposition of a sentence under a statute in effect at the time an offense was committed rather than lesser sentence provided for by an amended statute which was enacted after commission of the charged
  • State v. Dick 951 So. 2d 124 La. 2007
    We noted this court has consistently held that the law in effect at the time of the commission of the offense is determinative of the penalty which the accused must suffer, and that a defendant must be sentenced according to the sentencing provisions in effect at the time of the commission of the offense.
  • State v. Mourra 940 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
  • State v. Moses 932 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
  • State v. Pulliam 920 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    see also, accord, (Imposition of a sentence under a statute in effect at the time an offense was committed rather than lesser sentence provided for by an amended statute which was enacted after commission of the charged
  • State of Louisiana v. David James Pulliam La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    We acknowledge Louisiana’s prior case law on the subject has adhered to the rule that “the law in effect at the time of the commission of the offense is determinative of the penalty which the convicted accused must suffer.” see also, accord, (Imposition of a sentence under a statute in effect at the time an offense was committed rather than lesser sentence provided for by an amended statute which was enacted after commission of the charged
  • State v. Williams 905 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407, p. 4 (La.6/21/02)
  • State v. Parker 871 So. 2d 317 La. 2004
  • State v. Harris 868 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Esteen 846 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Martin 839 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    5 Cir. 5/29/02) , ( (La.
  • State v. Harris 839 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Moseley 830 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Drane 828 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02)
  • State v. Sugasti 820 So. 2d 518 La. 2002
    On appeal, the fifth circuit, (La.
  • State v. Martin 822 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    the Louisiana Supreme Court held that “the law in effect at the time of the commission of the offense is determinative of the penalty which the convicted accused must suffer.” This has been the rule of law consistently applied by the courts of this state.
  • State v. Mayeux 820 So. 2d 526 La. 2002
    see also, accord, (Imposition of a sentence under a statute in effect at the time an offense was committed rather than lesser sentence provided for by an amended statute which was enacted after commission of the charged
  • State v. Wyatt 821 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Keith, 35,644 (La.App.2d Cir.02/27/02), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Cook 820 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Rivers 817 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    5 Cir. 11/27/01) , at 946 ; we stated: the Louisiana Supreme Court held that "the law in effect at the time of the commission of the offense is determinative of the penalty which the convicted accused must suffer."
  • State v. Flagg 815 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Sugasti 802 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    the Louisiana Supreme Court held that "the law in effect at the time of the commission of the offense is determinative of the penalty which the convicted accused must suffer."
  • State v. Sneed 571 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990