DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Gibson, 391 So. 2d 421.

240 citing documents.

  • State v. Vanderpool 493 So. 2d 574 La. 1986
  • State v. Green 493 So. 2d 1178 La. 1986
    this court determined the harmless error rule of Chapman used by the federal courts was "the standard most compatible with this Court's view of its own criminal appellate jurisdiction."
  • State v. Free 493 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    Moreover, our Supreme Court adopted the test for "harmless error" of Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct.
  • State v. Floyd 490 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    art. 921 provides that “a judgment or a ruling shall not be reversed by an appellate court because of any error, defect, irregularity, or variance which does not affect the substantial rights of the accused.” which adopted the “harmless error test formulated by the U.S. Supreme court in Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct.
  • State v. Barnes 491 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    In determining whether an error is harmless, the question is whether there is a reasonable possibility that the admission or exclusion of certain evidence "might have contributed to the conviction"
  • State v. Scott 490 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    The Supreme Court of Louisiana, (La.
  • State v. Smith 489 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Barnes 489 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Williams 489 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Const. Art. I, § 5; State v. Owen
  • State v. Walker 489 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967)
  • State v. Williams 489 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Cameron 485 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
    Moreover, the Louisiana Supreme Court adopted the "harmless error" test of Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct.
  • State v. Reed 483 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Ward 483 So. 2d 578 La. 1986
    In any event, we cannot say that this "error" reasonably might have contributed to the conviction, and any error is therefore harmless.
  • State v. Hamilton 478 So. 2d 123 La. 1985
  • State v. Reynolds 473 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    declare a belief that [the error] was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.'" quoting and adopting Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24 , 87 S.Ct.
  • State v. Ross 474 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    the Louisiana Supreme Court adopted the “harmless error” test of Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct.
  • State v. Phillips 471 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Porretto 468 So. 2d 1142 La. 1985
    824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967)
  • State v. Jenkins 468 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Ketton 468 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Jones 467 So. 2d 147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Brown 467 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Holmes 467 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    in which the court held that the harmless error rule is the "standard most compatible with this Court's view of its own criminal appellant jurisdiction."
  • State v. Rankin 465 So. 2d 679 La. 1985
    [4] In any case, since the 1979 amendment to the Code of Criminal Procedure art. 921 our state harmless error rule mirrors the federal rule.
  • State v. Rovaris 464 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Santee 464 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
    824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967)
  • State v. Koll 463 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    declare a belief that [the error] was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.’ ” quoting and adopting Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24 , 87 S.Ct.
  • State v. Rushing 464 So. 2d 268 La. 1985
  • State v. Diaz 461 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
    In its interpretation of the article, adopted the "harmless error" test formulated by the U.S. Supreme Court in Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct.
  • State v. Nelson 459 So. 2d 510 La. 1984
  • State v. Daley 459 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Martin 458 So. 2d 454 La. 1984
    Moreover, we adopted the test for "harmless error," of Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct.
  • State v. Hocum 456 So. 2d 602 La. 1984
  • State v. Orlando 456 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    in which the Supreme Court ruled in part as follows: Accordingly, this Court is no longer required by statute to reverse a criminal decision if there is any constitutional error in the proceedings below, and it is no longer authorized to reverse upon finding that there has been a miscarriage of justice.
  • State v. McLeland 456 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    the Louisiana Supreme Court adopted the harmless error test enunciated by the U.S. Supreme Court in Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct.
  • State v. Roberson 454 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Whitlock 454 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    our Supreme Court adopted the federal standard in Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct.
  • State v. Jackson 454 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    Under our circumstances, there is no "reasonable possibility that the constitutional error complained of might have contributed to the conviction,"
  • State v. Jackson 454 So. 2d 116 La. 1984
  • State v. Welcome 458 So. 2d 1235 La. 1984
  • State v. Dabney 452 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Guerin 452 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Perkins 451 So. 2d 1146 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    articulated the proper standard to be applied by appellate courts to determine if the trial court's erroneous admission of illegally seized evidence warrants reversal of a defendant's conviction.
  • State v. Weeks 449 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Vaughn 448 So. 2d 1260 La. 1984
  • State v. Vessell 450 So. 2d 938 La. 1984
  • State v. Boutte 447 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Westfall 446 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Marquer 446 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984