Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Gibson, 391 So. 2d 421.

240 citing documents.

State v. Wright 446 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Tullos 446 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Phillips 444 So. 2d 1196 La. 1984
State v. Johnson 444 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
art. 921 provides, “[a] judgment or ruling shall not be reversed by an appellate court because of any error, defect, or irregularity, or variance which does not affect substantial rights of the accused.” In deciding whether an error involving the denial of a federal constitutional right can be held harmless in a state prosecution, the Louisiana Supreme Court, adopted the standard enunciated in Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct.
State v. Henry 439 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
held that "[i]f the error is the kind that *1246 may be deemed harmless, the burden is on someone other than the person prejudiced by it to show that it was harmless.
State v. Doucet 443 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State ex rel. Sterling 441 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
the Louisiana Supreme Court adopted the “harmless error” analysis as set forth in Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct.
State v. Banks 439 So. 2d 407 La. 1983
declare a belief that [the error] was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.'" quoting and adopting Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24 , 87 S.Ct.
State v. Cotten 438 So. 2d 1156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court expressly adopted the federal "harmless error test" to be applied to evidence admitted in alleged violation of constitutional rights.
State v. Mitchell 437 So. 2d 264 La. 1983
State v. Morris 435 So. 2d 423 La. 1983
State v. Boelyn 432 So. 2d 260 La. 1983
State v. Stokes 433 So. 2d 96 La. 1983
State v. Banks 428 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
the Supreme Court of Louisiana adopted the "harmless error" test first announced in Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct.
State v. Walker 430 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Alexander 430 So. 2d 621 La. 1983
State v. Vaughn 431 So. 2d 358 La. 1983
State v. Lindsey 428 So. 2d 420 La. 1983
State v. Ray 423 So. 2d 1116 La. 1982
State v. Pierce 422 So. 2d 1157 La. 1982
State v. Montana 421 So. 2d 895 La. 1982
State v. Shea 421 So. 2d 200 La. 1982
State v. Jackson 419 So. 2d 425 La. 1982
State v. Landry 414 So. 2d 674 La. 1982
State v. Sharp 418 So. 2d 1344 La. 1982
State v. Wheeler 416 So. 2d 78 La. 1982
State v. Phagans 412 So. 2d 580 La. 1982
State v. Humphrey 412 So. 2d 507 La. 1982
State v. Frisco 411 So. 2d 37 La. 1982
State v. Barrow 410 So. 2d 1070 La. 1982
State v. Hernandez 410 So. 2d 1381 La. 1982
State v. Rives 407 So. 2d 1195 La. 1981
State v. Bourg 407 So. 2d 1202 La. 1981
State v. Smith 408 So. 2d 1110 La. 1981
we can conclude without any difficulty that there was no reasonable possibility that the court clerk's testimony contributed to the conviction.
State v. Thomas 406 So. 2d 1325 La. 1981
State v. Green 404 So. 2d 977 La. 1981
467 , 38 L.Ed.2d 427 (1973)
State v. Smith 401 So. 2d 1179 La. 1981
State v. White 399 So. 2d 172 La. 1981
State v. Redic 392 So. 2d 451 La. 1980
Null v. Wainwright, 508 F.2d 340 (5th Cir. 1975).
State v. Thucos 390 So. 2d 1281 La. 1980
the test for determining whether a conviction for a crime should stand when a state has failed to accord federal constitutionally guaranteed rights is, as held in Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct.