Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Steele, 387 So. 2d 1175.

195 citing documents.

State v. Powell 671 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Taylor 663 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
The "same evidence test" as follows: If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.
State v. Coates 661 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Ellis 657 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
City of Baton Rouge v. Ross 654 So. 2d 1311 La. 1995
State v. Woods 654 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
(1980); State v. Roy Warner, supra ; State v. Smith, 94-0621 (La.App.
State v. Warner 653 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Smith, 94-0621 (12/15/ 94 La.App.
State v. Smith 647 So. 2d 1321 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
(1980); State v. Bonfanti, 262 La.
State v. Williams 647 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Girouard 615 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
See, State v. Steele, [ ] supra.
State v. Harrison 612 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Thornton 611 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Carouthers 607 So. 2d 1018 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
The "same evidence test" as follows: If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.
State v. Love 602 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
The "same evidence test" as follows: "If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.
State v. Head 598 So. 2d 1202 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
State v. Didier, 262 La.
State v. Powell 598 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Griffin 563 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
The "same evidence test" as follows: "If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.
State v. Wilson 538 So. 2d 1124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
*1126 the supreme court at page 1177 said: “If the evidence required to support a finding of guilty of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one....” * * # He * * “the central id
State v. Hargrove 522 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Justice Watson has suggested that the “same evidence” test is broader in concept than Blockburger because “the central idea [is] that one should not be punished (or put in jeopardy) twice for the same course of conduct.”
State v. Williams 524 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Robertson 511 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Deal 511 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Mills 505 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Knowles, supra.
State v. Anderson 499 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Gerrel 499 So. 2d 381 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
The "same evidence" as follows: "If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one."
State v. Banks 496 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Barnes 496 So. 2d 1056 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Payton 496 So. 2d 1068 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Jacobs 493 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Buttner 489 So. 2d 970 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
United States v. Benz, 282 U.S. 304 , 51 S.Ct.
State v. Claiborne 483 So. 2d 1301 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Holmes 475 So. 2d 1057 La. 1985
State v. Briscoe 471 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
306 (1932); we concluded, in Smith , that conviction on both counts of LSA-R.S.
State v. Kirkley 470 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Cureaux 467 So. 2d 1377 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Rogers 462 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Williams 461 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
State v. Smith 461 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
The second, provides: “If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea qf double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.
State v. Lockhart 457 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Hope 449 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Defraites 449 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
A : If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.
State v. Coody 448 So. 2d 100 La. 1984
This Court has also utilized the "same evidence" test, which was articulated as follows, at 1177 (La.1980): ...
State v. Vaughn 431 So. 2d 763 La. 1983
(La.1980; State v. Didier, 262 La.
State v. Fontenot 408 So. 2d 919 La. 1981
and the "same evidence" test
State v. Knowles 392 So. 2d 651 La. 1980
This court has employed both the "Blockburger" test, see, for example, and the "same evidence" test.