DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Steele, 387 So. 2d 1175.

195 citing documents.

  • State v. Cogswell 918 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    State v. Didier, 262 La.
  • State of Louisiana v. John Joseph La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    the court utilized the “same evidence” test, which was articulated as follows: If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction for the other, the two are the same under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed
  • State v. Joseph 916 So. 2d 378 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    the court utilized the "same evidence" test, which was articulated as follows: If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction for the other, the two are the same under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for onl
  • State v. Gardner 907 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that test as follows: If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.
  • State v. Price 899 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Rabun 880 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Knowles, supra; State v. Coody, supra; (La.App.
  • State v. Barakat 877 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Baptiste 875 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Gibson 867 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    as follows: If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.
  • State v. Blackson 865 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Bates 859 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Ceasar 856 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Barton 857 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that test as follows: If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a *1202 plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.
  • State v. Kelley 836 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    : *1247 If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.
  • State v. Burt 828 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    : If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.
  • State v. Davies 813 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Wilson 806 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    The "same evidence test" as follows: If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.
  • State v. Pierce 799 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
  • State v. White 799 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    : If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.
  • State v. Jones 799 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    The "same evidence test" as follows: `If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.
  • State v. Murray 799 So. 2d 453 La. 2001
  • State v. Allen 793 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    The "same evidence test" as follows: If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.
  • State v. Arnold 801 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Kennon 781 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Lefeure 778 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that test as follows: *751 If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.
  • State v. Cotton 778 So. 2d 569 La. 2001
  • State v. Muralles 802 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    City of Baton Rouge v. Ross, 94-0695, pp. 17-19 (La.4/28/95), -1323 , -608 (La.1990); State v. Knowles, supra
  • State v. Burnett 768 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    see also State v. Knowles, supra ; State v. Coody, supra; (La.App.
  • State v. Ballett 756 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    (1980); State v. Roy Warner,[ (La.App.4th Cir. 1995), ] supra ; State v. Smith, 94-0621 (La.App.4 Cir. 12/15/94), ; State v. Williams, 92-2080 (La.
  • State v. Downey 744 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • State v. Skipper 737 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    (1980); State v. Roy Warner[, 94-2649 (La.App.
  • State v. Texada 734 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    The "same evidence test" as follows: "If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.
  • State v. Bridgewater 726 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that test as follows: If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.
  • State v. Bryant 729 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    State v. Bonfanti, 262 La.
  • State v. Bailey 713 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    See Coody, supra at 102 ; Vaughn, supra at 766
  • State v. Watson 706 So. 2d 1044 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    The "same evidence test", provides that: If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.
  • State v. Hammond 704 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    [2] In addition to utilizing Blockburger' s "same elements" test, Louisiana utilizes the "same evidence"
  • State v. Cole 702 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    t where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one; is whether each provision requires *840 proof of an additional fact which the other does not ...” The “same evidence test” as follows: “If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a
  • State v. Pendelton 696 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    : If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.
  • State v. Jackson 694 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Prince 688 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S.Ct.
  • State v. Lewis 687 So. 2d 1056 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    (1980); State v. Roy Warner, supra [ (1995)]; State v. Smith, 94-0621 (La.App.
  • State v. Dixon 685 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    The “same evidence” as follows: If the evidence required to suppoH a finding of guilt of one crime ivould also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.
  • State v. McMooain 680 So. 2d 1370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    This test, called the "same evidence" test, is somewhat broader in concept than Blockburger , (La.
  • State v. Steward 681 So. 2d 1007 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    the "same evidence" test was described as follows: If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.
  • State v. Sandifer 679 So. 2d 1324 La. 1996
  • State v. Smith 676 So. 2d 1068 La. 1996
    See Coody, supra at 102 ; Vaughn, supra at 766
  • State v. Thomas 680 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    The "same evidence test" as follows: `If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.
  • State v. Washington 670 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    The “same evidence” as follows: If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.
  • State v. Washington 670 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    The "same evidence" as follows: If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.