Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Simmons, 390 So. 2d 504.

32 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Morgan E. Douglas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
” State v. Adger, 35,414, p. 5 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Nathaniel Lambert La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Fulford La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Jason L. Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 4/28/99), (en banc), writ denied, 99–1577 (La.11/5/99), and writ denied, 01–2178 (La.4/19/02), (); State v. Colar, 04–1003 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Robert Moten AKA Robert Mouton AKA Robert L. Mouton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
4/19/02), (); State v. Colar, 04-1003 (La.App.
State v. Moten 158 So. 3d 972 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 4/28/99) , (en banc), writ denied, 99-1577 (La.11/5/99), , and writ denied, 01-2178 (La.4/19/02), (); State v. Colar, 04-1003 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Christopher B. Miller La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
4/19/02), (), this court held that appellate review is required in open-ended pleas “because appeals are favored and there is a 2 Before the trial court took up the defendant’s guilty plea to simple burglary, the defendant admitted that he violated his conditions of probation in another matter (CR-112
State v. Miller 114 So. 3d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 4/28/99), , writ denied, 99-1577 (La.11/5/99), , and writ denied, 01-2178 (La.4/19/02), (), this court held that appellate review is required in open-ended pleas “because appeals are favored and there is a ^constitutional right in Louisiana to an appeal.” The holding in Pickens was reiterated in State v. Curtis, 04-111, p. 2 (La.App.
State in the Interest of Jv & Hv La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State in the Interest of Jv & Hv La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Bordelon 33 So. 3d 842 La. 2009
¡,§ 19 guarantees that “[n]o person shall be subjected to imprisonment or forfeiture of rights or property without the right of judicial review,” the article also provides without qualification that this right “may be intelligently waived.” The right of waiver is personal to the defendant, and the waiver “must be an informed one.”
State v. Arceneaux 983 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State ex rel. D.A.G. 935 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Colar 893 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State of Louisiana v. Briant Keith Colar La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Adger 803 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Pickens 741 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Distinguished State v. Gonzales 680 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Likewise, wherein the Court stated that the right to an appeal is personal to a defendant and that any waiver of this right must be made by the defendant are also distinguishable The appellant contends that because she did not specifically waive her right to appeal, the a
State v. Vail 571 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Bay 567 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
State v. Shanes 493 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Bienemy 483 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Counterman 475 So. 2d 336 La. 1985
State v. McDonald 471 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Counterman 461 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized that a defendant may be entitled to an "out-of-time" appeal if he was unconstitutionally deprived of his right to appeal.
State v. Dill 461 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
It would appear clear that an attorney must advise his client of his appellate rights
State v. Calloway 458 So. 2d 469 La. 1984
State v. Davis 457 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
The Louisiana Supreme Court recognized the "
State v. Helsley 457 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Hughes v. State 451 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Ceasar 449 So. 2d 1385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Criticized State v. Holmes 440 So. 2d 1384 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983