DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jones, 404 So. 2d 1192.

110 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. George Joseph La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
  • State Of Louisiana v. Aaron Wayne Bush La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
  • State v. Peters 253 So. 3d 785 La. 2018
    In response to the state's minute entries associated with defendant's three guilty pleas to misdemeanor DWI in Mississippi, which do not indicate whether defendant was advised of his Boykin rights in accordance with State v. Jones , (La.
  • State v. Billups 188 So. 3d 1124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969)
  • State v. Granier 178 So. 3d 1106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State v. Lee 171 So. 3d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969), and State ex rel Jackson v. Henderson, 260 La.
  • State v. Easter 170 So. 3d 1051 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State v. Jefferson 26 So. 3d 112 La. 2009
    (Dennis, J., Dixon, C.J., and Calogero, J., additionally concurring); La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Juane Harris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Farinas 28 So. 3d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969), and State ex rel.
  • State v. Balsano 11 So. 3d 475 La. 2009
  • State of Louisiana v. Dominique J. Casson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Casson 2 So. 3d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Price 996 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Dardar 977 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Juniors 915 So. 2d 291 La. 2005
    Boykin, supra; State ex rel.
  • State v. Guilbeau 838 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Stewart 827 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    the supreme court set forth the requirements which must be met for accepting a guilty plea in a misdemeanor case: Accordingly, whenever a misdemeanor guilty plea will be used as a basis for actual imprisonment, enhancement of actual imprisonment or conversion of a subsequent misdemeanor into a felony
  • State v. Bouie 817 So. 2d 48 La. 2002
  • State v. Hight 810 So. 2d 1250 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); (La.
  • State v. Munholland 797 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Cadiere, 99-0970 (La.App.
  • State v. Foy 808 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Anderson 784 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Callegari 773 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Casse 772 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Frickey 769 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    a pre- Carlos case, [W]henever a misdemeanor guilty plea will be used as a basis for actual imprisonment, enhancement of actual imprisonment or conversion of a subsequent misdemeanor into a felony, it is incumbent upon the trial judge to inform the defendant that by pleading guilty he waives (a) his p
  • State v. Gardette 760 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Guzman 769 So. 2d 1158 La. 2000
    This Court reversed, and reinstated the defendant's conviction and sentence for third offense DWI holding as follows: The transcript of defendant's January, 1995
  • State v. Phillips 762 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    that the defendant was represented by counsel, that there was nothing in the record of the predicate guilty plea that undercut the presumption that counsel explained the nature of the charge in sufficient detail, and that the defendant had notice of what his plea asked him to admit.
  • State v. Drenning 767 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    |4 the Louisiana Supreme Court extended the three Boykin rights articulation rule of State ex rel Jackson v. Henderson, 260 La.
  • State v. Stewart 754 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969)
  • State v. Fitch 753 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); State v. Lott, 29,082 & 29,083 (La.App.2d Cir.1/22/97), , writ denied, 97-0711 (La.9/26/97), .
  • State v. Brady 748 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Gaar 746 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Carlos 738 So. 2d 556 La. 1999
    Additionally, we extended the three-right articulation rule of State ex rel Jackson v. Henderson, 260 La.
  • State v. Whiddon 741 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Davis 734 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    1 Cir.1988), this court held that a minute entry which only stated that the defendant had been informed of his rights and the consequences of his plea
  • State v. Pertuit 734 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Anderson 732 So. 2d 517 La. 1999
    The transcript of defendant's January, 1995
  • State v. Franks 730 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); (La.
  • State v. Inzina 728 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    the supreme court stated that, when a misdemeanor guilty plea will be used as a basis for actual imprisonment or conversion of a subsequent misdemeanor into a felony, the trial judge must inform the defendant that he waives his right against compulsory self-incrimination, his right to trial and his right to
  • State v. Anderson 720 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    Anderson's attorney filed a motion to quash the January 5, 1995 guilty plea on grounds that the court accepting the plea "never ascertained if the defendant understood the nature and consequences of the charge before the court[.]" (La.
  • State v. Newman 707 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    the supreme court extended the constitutional and procedural safeguards afforded felony plea proceedings to certain misdemeanor plea proceedings and found that those safeguards were not limited by the three recognized constitutional rights in Boykin .
  • State v. Dumas 703 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. Nelson 712 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    In order for a misdemeanor guilty plea to be used as a basis for actual imprisonment or conversion of a subsequent misdemeanor into a felony, the trial judge must have informed the defendant of his Boykin rights and must ascertain that the accused understood what the plea connotes “and its consequences.” State v. Lott, 29,082 (La.App.
  • State v. Lott 688 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); see also State v. Deroche, 95-0376 (La.App.
  • State v. Deroche 674 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. Pertuit 673 So. 2d 1055 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the exact issue facing us. In Jones , the defendant, who was convicted of third offense DWI, argued that his two previous convictions could not serve as predicates for a third offense because he had not been "Boykinized" before entering a guilty plea to the first two ch
  • State v. O'Brien 623 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Delanoix 637 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993