DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jones, 404 So. 2d 1192.

110 citing documents.

  • State v. Morris 619 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Walker 606 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    in support of his argument.
  • State v. Mobley 592 So. 2d 1282 La. 1992
  • State v. Lawrence 600 So. 2d 1341 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Sammon 582 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Mobley 568 So. 2d 1368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Longo 560 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Hall 537 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Verrett 536 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    and that the signed guilty plea forms are not properly executed nor authenticated as contemporaneously executed' at the time the guilty pleas were tendered.
  • State v. Monk 532 So. 2d 1143 La. 1988
  • State v. Wilkerson 533 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Laird 532 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    [Crosby has been routinely followed in cases involving reservation of Fourth Amendment claims].
  • State v. Carson 527 So. 2d 1018 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Jones 522 So. 2d 560 La. 1988
  • State v. McMellon 525 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Davenport 520 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    the Louisiana Supreme Court determined that in misdemeanor cases, "boykinization" is only required for *465 guilty pleas that will be used as a basis for actual imprisonment, enhancement of actual imprisonment, or conversion of a subsequent misdemeanor into a felony.
  • State v. Jackson 519 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    stating [W]henever a misdemeanor guilty plea will be used as a basis for actual imprisonment, enhancement of actual imprisonment or conversion of a subsequent misdemeanor into a felony, it is incumbent upon the trial judge to inform the defendant that by pleading guilty he waives (a) his privilege aga
  • State v. Wright 517 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    that: [W]henever a misdemeanor guilty plea will be used as a basis for actual imprisonment, enhancement of actual imprisonment or conversion of a subsequent misdemeanor into a felony, it is incumbent upon the trial judge to inform the defendant that by pleading guilty he waives (a) his privilege against comp
  • State v. Jones 517 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • State v. St. Pierre 515 So. 2d 769 La. 1987
    90 , (1971), to all misdemeanor guilty pleas which could be used as a basis for imprisonment or enhancement of sentence.
  • State v. Scott 508 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    which first *107 applied Boykin rights to misdemeanor prosecutions in Louisiana.
  • State v. Hanna 505 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    the Louisiana Supreme Court held that whenever a misdemeanor guilty plea will be used as basis for actual imprisonment or conversion of a subsequent misdemeanor into a felony the Boykin-Jackson rule applies, i.e., it must be affirmatively shown that the defendant waived the right to trial, the right to conf
  • State v. Myers 503 So. 2d 1085 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    that the three right articulation rule of Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 89 S.Ct.
  • State v. Skeetoe 501 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Carson 495 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    must the State show that, prior *308 to the entry of the guilty plea by the defendant which resulted in that conviction, the defendant had been adequately advised of his constitutional rights under Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 89 S.Ct.
  • State v. Saddler 490 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Nunnery 482 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Vidrine 476 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    ( Boykin examinations in misdemeanors).
  • State v. Tharpe 459 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Shuff 459 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Bolden 437 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    and appellant was not “Boykinized” at that time, this last speeding conviction cannot be used to adjudge him a multiple traffic offender.
  • State v. McClendon 420 So. 2d 1135 La. 1982
    This misdemeanor guilty plea, entered on October 7, 1981, which was rendered on September 10, 1981.
  • State v. Lewis 421 So. 2d 224 La. 1982
  • State v. Lewis 421 So. 2d 227 La. 1982
  • State v. Waltman 420 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969) to invalidate civil disabilities arising from pri- or misdemeanor convictions based on “non-Boykinized” guilty pleas.
  • State v. Santiago 416 So. 2d 524 La. 1982
    this writer has gone along with the majority's application of Boykin , and does so today, noting defendant's guilty plea was nonetheless, in my opinion, knowingly and intelligently made although not in compliance with our application of Boykin .
  • State v. Moore 416 So. 2d 1298 La. 1982
    We granted certiorari to clarify, by means of an express holding by this court in a particular case
  • State v. Bosworth 415 So. 2d 912 La. 1982
    In support of this contention
  • State v. Age 417 So. 2d 1183 La. 1982
    Additionally, Dunn was a which held that Boykin was applicable to misdemeanor cases.
  • State v. Toney 412 So. 2d 1034 La. 1982
    Most recently, it has become incumbent upon the trial courts, whenever a misdemeanor guilty plea will be used as a basis for actual imprisonment, enhancement of actual imprisonment or conversion of a subsequent misdemeanor into a felony, to inform the defendant that by pleading guilty he waives (a) his privilege against s
  • State v. Stephenson 412 So. 2d 553 La. 1982
  • State v. Parker 411 So. 2d 449 La. 1982
  • State v. Moore 408 So. 2d 1220 La. 1982
    On September 10, 1981, this Court rendered a in which the Court addressed the identical issues presented in this case.
  • State v. Higginbotham 412 So. 2d 75 La. 1982
  • State v. Morris 411 So. 2d 45 La. 1982
    upon which the judge relied is not applicable here because that decision by its terms, applies prospectively only, or to cases pending in this Court at the time the decision was rendered, and the present prosecution was not pending in this Court at the time Jones was rendered.
  • State v. Lee 407 So. 2d 1192 La. 1981
    (1981), this court made the following statement: Accordingly, whenever a misdemeanor guilty plea will be used as a basis for actual imprisonment, enhancement of actual imprisonment or conversion of a subsequent misdemeanor into a felony, it is incumbent upon the trial judge to inform the defendant that by pleading gui
  • State v. Newman 410 So. 2d 235 La. 1981
    Ruling denying motion to quash information for DWI 3 is remanded on ground that the June 8, 1977 conviction for DWI 2
  • State v. Mobley 410 So. 2d 235 La. 1981
  • State v. Perryman 410 So. 2d 235 La. 1981
  • State v. Wright 410 So. 2d 235 La. 1981
    Case remanded to district court for hearing as to whether or not defendant was properly Boykinized in connection with her 1977 and 1979