Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Martin, 400 So. 2d 1063.

72 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Adrian Anton Dorsey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
entence.” Nevertheless, “[w]here the record clearly shows an adequate factual basis for the sentence imposed[, the supreme] court has held that remand is unnecessary, even where there has not been full compliance with Article 894.1.” ( ).
State of Louisiana v. Kelby Meaux A/K/A Kelby D. Meaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
entence.” Nevertheless, “[w]here the record clearly shows an adequate factual basis for the sentence imposed[, the supreme] court has held that remand is unnecessary, even where there has not been full compliance with Article 894.1.” ( 8 and State v. Douglas[, ]).
State v. Laneheart 135 So. 3d 1221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Douglas, supra.
State v. Mills 120 So. 3d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Douglas, supra.
State of Louisiana v. Arthur Bias, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Bias 63 So. 3d 399 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Anthony Romero La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Materre 53 So. 3d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Turner 32 So. 3d 277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
2d Cir.2/24/99), , writ denied, 99-1010 (La.9/3/99)
State v. Williams 738 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
on rehearing; State v. Guidroz, 721 So.2d at 489 .
State v. Bush 733 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
*56 (La.1976); State v. O'Day, 191 La.
State v. Guidroz 721 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Hardy 715 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
However, a remand for more complete compliance with Article 894.1 is not necessary when the sentence imposed is not apparently severe, or where the record otherwise clearly illumines the sentencing choice, on rehearing.
State v. White 704 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Washington 687 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
State v. Washington 687 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Spencer 683 So. 2d 1326 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Jackson 668 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Jackson 629 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Jackson 629 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Greer 572 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Robinson 569 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. White 538 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Grey 522 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Bennett 524 So. 2d 1297 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Smith 520 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
This court has indicated, however, that a remand for more complete compliance with Article 894.1 is not necessary when the sentence imposed is not apparently severe, *1258 (La.1981), or where the record otherwise clearly illumines the sentencing choice, (On Rehearing).
State v. Mitchell 498 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
1982); , on rehearing, (La.
State v. Caillouet 496 So. 2d 1312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
(on rehearing new trial ordered on other grounds); State v. Martin, [ ] supra; reversed on other grounds, 447 U.S. 323 , 100 S.Ct.
State v. Viator 495 So. 2d 1341 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Tzuanos 491 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Rious 490 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Thompson 489 So. 2d 1364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Watson 484 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Francis 482 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Cox 474 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Lawson 474 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
(on rehearing); (La.App.
State v. Brockett 471 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Rivers 470 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Coleman 469 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
or where the record otherwise clearly illumines the sentencing choice, (on rehearing).
State v. Mosley 466 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Kennedy 461 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
I agree that these facts "clearly illume the sentencing choice of the trial judge" ( and "allow us to make an independent determination of whether this sentence is excessive" (see State v. Smith, supra ).
State v. Barberousse 458 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Richardson 459 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Brown 446 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. England 442 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
See also, on rehearing, ” In applying those principles to the instant case, (La.App.
State v. Moore 442 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Horne 438 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Lewis 434 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Boyette 434 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Neslo 433 So. 2d 73 La. 1983
Furthermore, on rehearing.