Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Campbell v. Mouton, 373 So. 2d 237.

131 citing documents.

Moore v. Brookshire Grocery Co., Inc. 805 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Odom v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HOSP. 733 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Odom v. Johnson 704 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
3d Cir.), writ denied, Campbell [v. Mouton], supra, [ ] at 239-240 [La.App.
Collins v. Whitaker 691 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
*824 App.2d Cir.1993); (La.App.
Millet v. Cormier 671 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
King of Hearts, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 660 So. 2d 524 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Carter v. Western Kraft Paper Mill 649 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Bowers v. Viator 625 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
3rd Cir.1982), we discussed the proper standard to be applied in deciding a (La.App.
Goza v. Cornwell 622 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
art. 1810 from which we quote: “Moreover, since the source of LSA-C.C.P.
Jones v. Merritt 618 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Fisher v. Clarkson 613 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
The standard of proof by which a trial judge determines the propriety of a motion for JNOV under art. 1811 (La.App.
Neal v. Highlands Ins. Co. 610 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
the standard for the application of a JNOV was enunciated.
Segura v. Andries 610 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
App. 1st Cir.1981); (La.App.
Joseph v. Cannon 609 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
As to the proper standard, that court pronounced, and we adopt, the following: The standard for granting a directed verdict (Art. 1810(A) of the Louisiana Civil Code Procedure) (La.App.
Cotton v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 602 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Toon v. Lederle Laboratories 603 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Guillory v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. 604 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
which quoted the following language of the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal in Boeing v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365 (5th Cir.1969): “ ‘ “On motions for directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict the Court should consider all of the evidence — not just that evidence which supports the non-mov
Daigle v. Audi of America, Inc. 598 So. 2d 1304 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Thompson v. Penrod Drilling Co. 597 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Rutledge v. Tidewater Marine Service, Inc. 597 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
The standard for the granting of a appeal after remand, where we adopted the following language from Boeing v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365 (5th Cir.1969): *1204 On motions for directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict the Court should consider all of the evidence — not just that ev
Adams v. Travelers Ins. Co. 589 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Cliburn v. Colonial Penn Ins. Co. 583 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Romero v. Emerson Elec. Co. 583 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
which quoted the following language of the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal in Boeing v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365 (5th Cir.1969): "`"On motions for directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict the Court should consider all of the evidencenot just that evidence which supports the non-mover's
Trans-Global Alloy v. First Nat. Bank 583 So. 2d 443 La. 1991
Farque v. McKinney 576 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
The trial court, relying on this court's explanation of the standard for determining whether to grant a (La.
Johnson v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company 575 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
which quoted the following language of the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal in Boeing v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365 (5th Cir. 1969): "'"On motions for directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict the Court should consider all of the evidencenot just that evidence which supports the non-mover'
Calhoun v. Federated Rural Elec. Ins. 571 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Boeing *683 Co. v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365 (5th Cir.1969); (La.App.
Parker v. Boise Southern Co. 570 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV. v. Wahlder 554 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Hollier v. Lay Down Service, Inc. 554 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
which quoted the following language of the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal in Boeing v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365 (5th Cir.1969): ‘On motions for directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict the Court should consider all of the evidence — not just that evidence which supports the non-mover’s
Perschall v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 553 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
3rd Cir.1983), writ denied (La.App.
Ford v. Sears 552 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Poirrier v. Trailmobile, Inc. 550 So. 2d 1349 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Lopez v. Chicago Bridge and Iron Co. 546 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Guidry v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc. 546 So. 2d 1326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Patin v. Dow Chemical Co. 546 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Marcantel v. Breaux 544 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Jones v. Northbrook Ins. Co. 544 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Doming v. K-Mart Corp. 540 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
St. Landry Parish School Board v. Acadiana Tire Shop, Inc. 535 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Abraham ex rel. Abraham v. Lafayette Parish School Board 534 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Royal Insurance Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance 532 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Pearce v. Baltazar 529 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Miller v. Macon Ridge Farmers Ass'n 525 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
White v. Gulf States Utilities Co. 525 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Brannan v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc. 516 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Green v. Dupre 520 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Silliker v. St. Landry Police Jury 520 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
The standard of proof which the trial judge is to use in deciding a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict under Article 1811 (La.App.
Tide Craft, Inc. v. Red Ball Oxygen Co. 514 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Andrews v. Mosley Well Service 514 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
The purpose behind the directed verdict, (La.App.