Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., 393 So. 2d 1248.

76 citing documents.

Hubert Rougeau, Jr. v. Gottson Construction Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Rougeau cites Wilson v. Ebasco Serv., Inc., (La.
Rougeau v. Gottson Construction Co. 57 So. 3d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Rougeau cites Wilson v. Ebasco Serv., Inc., for the proposition that claims for future medical treatment have been allowed.
Giles v. General Motors Assembly Division 1 So. 3d 844 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Hutchinson v. Fred's Painting 707 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc.
Jeffcoat v. McCann's Seafood 696 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., (La.
Anderson v. Biedenharn Bottling Group 664 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc.
Thomas v. Highlands Ins. Co. 617 So. 2d 877 La. 1993
Wilson v. EBASCO Services, Inc., ("A workmen's compensation claimant is not entitled to an award for future medical expenses, but the right to claim such expenses is reserved to her.").
Durand on Behalf of Durand v. NAT. TEA CO. 607 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Recognizing the trial court's error, plaintiff has requested, in the alternative, that we order National to furnish her with a letter of financial responsibility, relying on Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., -1254 (La.1981).
Borne v. Tompkins-Beckwith, Inc. 595 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
1980), the Supreme Court recognized that the jurisprudence relating to “working in pain” cases is merely an embodiment of the broader concept expressed in the “odd-lot doctrine.” Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc.
Picou v. Circle, Inc. 578 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., (La.
Villagomez v. Howard Trucking Co. 569 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., Sharbono v. H & S Const. Co., (La.App.
Long v. Manville Forest Products Corp. 554 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
See, e.g., Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., (La.App.
Estopinal v. National Tea Co. 545 So. 2d 1133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc.
Wills v. Solida Const. Co. 543 So. 2d 1365 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., (La.App.
City of Eunice v. Louisiana Worker's Compensation Second Injury Board 527 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
See also, Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc.
Holiday v. Borden Chemical 524 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., (La.
DeGruy v. Pala, Inc. 525 So. 2d 1124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
The reasons for classifying substantial pain cases within the framework of the odd lot doctrine were explained aptly in Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., (La.
Hernandez v. FW Woolworth Co. 516 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., (La.App.
Loud v. Dixie Metal Co. 506 So. 2d 1355 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., (La.
Gobert v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 509 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., (La.
Williams v. State 489 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., Walker v. Gaines P. Wilson & Son, Inc., (La.
Fontenot v. Sunland Construction 482 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc.
Sharbono v. H & S CONST. CO. 478 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., *784 (La.App.
Baggett v. Bagwell Coating, Inc. 477 So. 2d 1303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., Dusang v. Henry Beck Builders, Inc.
Thornhill v. Luke Construction Co. 468 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Though there is some basis in the record for finding that plaintiff does incur pain, the record does not support a finding that plaintiff is “unable to engage in gainful employment for wages.”
Gibson v. Hayes Oilfield Const. Co. 467 So. 2d 1304 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., (La.
Lester v. Southern Cas. Ins. Co. 466 So. 2d 25 La. 1985
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., (La.App.
LaPrarie v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 463 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., Lemoine v. Employers Cas.
Miller v. E.M. Babst Co. 459 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
(La.1983) and Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc.
Latiolais v. Home Ins. Co. 454 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., (La.
Cupit v. Amax Nickel, Inc. 454 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc.
Gauthier v. Indiana Lumbermen's Mutual Insurance Co. of Indiana 454 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc.
Alexis v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 449 So. 2d 1084 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Ewing v. Trend Drilling Co. 446 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., (La.
Reynolds v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 445 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Zachry Co., Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc., Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., Gilcrease v. J.A.
Criticized Butler v. Overnite Transp. Co., Inc. 444 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
23:1314, as well as considering the humanitarian purposes behind the Workers Compensation Act, we decline to follow Hartsell .
Gales v. Dresser Industries, Inc. 444 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Citing Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., the Supreme Court stated: “These cases underscore the fact that in compensation situations where pain is the linchpin to make out a prima facie case for a worker’s classification in the odd lot category, the pain accompanying routine physical tasks an
Woodard v. Gregory and Cook, Inc. 442 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc.
Vernon v. Aetna Life and Cas. Ins. Co. 442 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
23:1221(2); Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., Whitaker v. Church's Fried Chicken, Inc.
Johnson v. Insurance Co. of North America 440 So. 2d 1385 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., (La.
Faucheux v. Hooker Chemical Corp. 440 So. 2d 1377 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., (La.
Singleton v. Bushnell & Co. 437 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc.
Perrilloux v. Godchaux-Henderson Sugar Co. 436 So. 2d 1325 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., Dusang v. Henry C. Beck Builders, Inc., supra.
Parks v. Louisiana Health Care Ass'n 436 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., (La.
Bernard v. Merit Drilling Co. 434 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., (La.
Perry v. Hotard's Plumbing 436 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Further, “A worker who cannot return to any gainful employment without suffering substantial pain is entitled to compensation benefits for total disability.” Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc.
Smith v. Northwestern Nat. Ins. Co. 432 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc.
Culp v. Belden Corp. 432 So. 2d 847 La. 1983
[3] In Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., at 1252 (La.1981), the reasons for such a classification was ably set forth as follows: It is in this sense that the injured worker who performs his tasks in pain falls within the ambit of the general odd-lot concept: an employee who experiences substantial pain when performing routine physical tasks may find that emp
Pendleton v. Spartan Bldg. Const. 432 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
See, Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., -1253 (La.1981).
Calogero v. City of New Orleans 434 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
23:1221(2); Wilson v. EBASCO Services, Inc., Dusang v. Henry C. Beck Builders, Inc., Whitaker v. Church’s Fried Chicken, Inc.