Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Banks v. ADMINISTRATOR OF DEPT. OF EMPLOYMENT SEC., 393 So. 2d 696.
- Crayton v. Whitfield 575 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- Lexing v. Francis 572 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- Price v. Blache 560 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- Sensley v. Administrator, Office of Employment Security 552 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- Sensley v. ADM'R, OFFICE OF EMP. SEC. 552 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-
Raymond v. Office of Employment Security
551 So. 2d 844
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
the ‘misconduct’ must have resulted from willful or wanton disregard of the employer’s interest, from a deliberate violation of the employer’s rules, or from a direct disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has the right to expect from his employees.” Furthermore, held that the term “misconduct” means intentional wrongdoing.
- Johnson v. Office of Employment Security 538 So. 2d 605 La. 1989
- Lewis v. Administrator 540 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-
Martin Mills, Inc. v. Dept. of Employment SEC.
541 So. 2d 205
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Banks [ v. Administrator of Department of Employment Security ] [ ] supra.
- Biddle v. Administrator, Division of Employment Security, Department of Labor 539 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- Brown v. Whitfield 537 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-
Johnson v. Office of Employment Security
536 So. 2d 779
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
the Supreme Court held "...
- Ford v. Patin 534 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
- Romano v. Whitfield 535 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
-
Franklin v. Whitfield
534 So. 2d 98
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Melton v. State, Office of Employment Sec, (La.App.
- Eugene v. Adm'r, Div. of Emp. SEC. 525 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
- Dipol v. ADM'R, OFFICE OF EMP. SEC. OF LA. DEPT. OF LABOR 526 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
- Joseph v. Blache 525 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
-
Distinguished
Pope v. Whitfield
524 So. 2d 108
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
where the court found no intentional wrong doing because there was no evidence that the claimant was ever told her method of reporting absences was faulty or that repetition would result in her discharge.
- Associated Catholic Charities of New Orleans, Inc. v. Repath 522 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- Brister v. Whitfield 522 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
- Lowery v. Whitfield 521 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
- Washington v. Whitfield 521 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
- Murray v. City of New Orleans 517 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- Canty v. Administrator of Louisiana Office of Employment Security 517 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
-
Gunn v. Gerace
516 So. 2d 1180
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Charbonnet v. Gerace, supra; (La.
-
Dupont v. Blanche
514 So. 2d 286
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
In Banks v. Administrator of Dept, of Employment, the Court held: “...
- Weber v. Whitfield 511 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- Gallien v. Administrator of the Office of Employment Security, Department of Labor 511 So. 2d 70 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- Wesley v. Whitfield 508 So. 2d 968 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- Butler v. Gerace 506 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
- Schexnider v. Blache 504 So. 2d 864 La. 1987
- Kliebert v. Peavey Co. 503 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- Bonner v. Blache 499 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
-
Randle v. Adm'r, La. Office of Employment SEC.
499 So. 2d 488
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
LRS 23:1634; Dawkins v. Sumrall, supra.
- Causin v. Blache 498 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
-
Brewington v. ADMIN. OF OFFICE OF EMPLOYMENT SEC.
497 So. 2d 418
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
our Supreme Court said: "The word `misconduct' in LSA-R.S.
- Savoy v. Administrator, Office of Employment Security of the Department of Labor & Institutional Food Sales 497 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
-
Ward v. Office of Employment SEC.
493 So. 2d 777
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Payne v. Antoine's Restaurant, supra ; (La.App.
-
Anderson v. Blache
490 So. 2d 1149
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Banks v. Administrator of the Department of Employment Security of the State of Louisiana, et al, Calhoun v. Administrator of the Department of Employment Security of the State of Louisiana, et al, (La.App.
-
Pelican Homestead & Savings Ass'n v. Blache
490 So. 2d 642
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Banks v. Adm’r, (La.App.
- Popularas v. Department of Labor, Office of Employment Security 488 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- Roberts v. Blache 488 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- Foster v. Blache 488 So. 2d 1290 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- Thomas v. Blache 488 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
- Banks v. Administrator, Louisiana Office of Employment Security 488 So. 2d 1067 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
- Carter v. Administrator of the Office of Employment Security, Department of Labor 487 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- Jantzen of Louisiana, Inc. v. Blache 486 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
- Hypolite v. Blache 482 So. 2d 940 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
-
Harris v. ADMINISTRATOR, LOUISIANA OFFICE OF EMPLOYMENT SEC.
480 So. 2d 886
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Gunderson v. Libbey Glass, supra; Ealy v. Sumrall, supra; (La.