Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Banks v. ADMINISTRATOR OF DEPT. OF EMPLOYMENT SEC., 393 So. 2d 696.

122 citing documents.

Carter v. Blache 476 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Scope of Review An employee can be discharged for unsatisfactory work performance without being guilty of disqualifying misconduct
Melton v. State, Office of Employment SEC. 473 So. 2d 925 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Thibodeaux, supra; Honea v. C.J. Blache, Administrator, Dept. of Labor and Lake Charles Memorial Hospital, supra.
Jenkins v. Blache 471 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
23:1634; Banks v. Adm'r, etc.
Honea v. Blache 469 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Jantzen of La., Inc. v. Blache 464 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Thibodeaux v. Louisiana Office of Employment Security 458 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Charbonnet v. Gerace 457 So. 2d 676 La. 1984
Jefferson Parish HU v. State O. of Emp. SEC. 458 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
the Supreme Court stated that "there must be legal and competent evidence to support the factual findings on which the administrative determination turns."
Ball v. Lockwood 440 So. 2d 932 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Sampson v. Admin'r, La. Office of Emp. SEC. 439 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Winzer v. Administrator of Department of Employment Security 437 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Southeastern Louisiana University v. Shelton 431 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Louisiana Office of Family Services v. Administrator, Louisiana Office of Employment Security 427 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Banks v. Administrator, Department of Employment Security
La. Off. of Fam. Serv. v. ADM'R, EMP. SEC. OFF. 427 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Banks v. Administrator, Department of Employment Security
LeBlang v. Office of Employment Security 425 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
The discharge was for misconduct connected with the work.” the court found that an employee was deprived of her rights to a fair hearing where the discharge contained in the notice of hearing by the Appeals Referee did not correspond with the reasons why the board upheld her dismissal and disqualification for benefits.
Dawkins v. Sumrall 424 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Black v. Sumrall 413 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Gunderson v. Libbey Glass 412 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
of Dept. of Employment, "the word `misconduct' in LSA-R.S.
Flemmons v. Administrator, Office of Security, Dept. of Labor 401 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
In this regard, the instant matter is different from that of Banks v. Administrator of the Department of Employment Security, et al., (1981), wherein our Supreme Court reversed and felt a new hearing was unnecessary since, in addition to the legal defect, the evidence did not show disqualifying misconduct.
Ealy v. Sumrall 401 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
of Dept. of Employment, "the word `misconduct' in LSA-R.S.
Morgan v. Lockwood 395 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Giss v. Sumrall 409 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981