Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Giron v. Housing Auth. of City of Opelousas, 393 So. 2d 1267.
-
City of Ruston v. Womack & Sons Construction Group, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
of City of Opelousas, Bilyeu v. Nat’l Union Fire Ins.
-
Heirs of John Beckwith LLC, Price Heirs LLC, James M. Foster Trust, Linda Price Ellzey, John v. Price, …
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
of City of Opelousas, (La.
-
Emerson and Colette Coleman, Individually and on Behalf of the Minor, Nakhia Coleman v. Lowery Carnival Company, Crabtree …
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
of City of Opelousas, Bilyeu v. Nat’l Union Fire Ins.
-
Bucks v. DirecTECH Southwest
266 So. 3d 467
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
of City of Opelousas , (La.
-
Harold Fils v. Starr Indemnity & Liability Insurance Co.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
of Opelousas, Gunter, Merrit v. Admin.
-
Bilyeu v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh
184 So. 3d 69
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
of City of Opelousas, Hibernia Nat’l Bank v. Antonini, 33,436 (La.App.
- Joseph v. Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center 156 So. 3d 210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
-
Oliver v. Orleans Parish School Board
133 So. 3d 38
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
of Opelousas, Levingston v. City of Shreveport, 44,000, p. 5 (La.App.
-
Roland Douglas Walet v. Southern Theatres Family Holding, LLC
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
of Opelousas, Cohen v. Brookshire Bros. Inc., 01-1159 (La.App.
-
Walet v. Southern Theatres Family Holding, LLC
116 So. 3d 681
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
of Opelousas, Cohen v. Brookshire Bros. Inc., 01-1159 (La.App.
-
Northa Lee Holmes v. Triad Hospitality D/B/A Clarion Hotel
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
of Opelousas, and Strouse v. M & M Properties, 32,792 3 (La.App.
-
Holmes v. Triad Hospitality
89 So. 3d 532
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
of Opelousas, and Strouse v. M & M Properties, 32,792 4(La.App.
-
Scranton v. Ashley Ann Energy, L.L.C.
91 So. 3d 1174
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Douglas v. Haro, 214 La.
- Raspanti v. Litchfield 89 So. 3d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
- Hoff v. LOUISIANA SUPERDOME 24 So. 3d 1037 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
- Taylor v. Babin 13 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-
Chromaceutical Advanced Technologies, Inc. v. Lundy & Davis, LLP
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
of City of Opelousas, (La.
-
Chromaceutical Advanced Technologies, Inc. v. Lundy & Davis, L.L.P.
4 So. 3d 227
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
of City of Opelousas, (citing: McMahon, Summary of Procedural Changes in Chapter 1, 3 L.S.A.: Code of Civil Procedure 2, 3 (1960); McMahon, The Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure, 21 La.L.Rev.
-
Williams v. PLACID REFINING COMPANY, LLC
962 So. 2d 1233
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
and Premier Bank, -1040 , (La.App.
-
HISTORIC RESTORATION v. RSUI Indem. Co.
955 So. 2d 200
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
351 , (1946); see also, (A preliminary injunction is only provisional and is not intended as a resolution of the merits of a controverted issue.)
-
Levine v. First Nat. Bank of Commerce
948 So. 2d 1051
La. 2006
art. 3601; Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Division of Administration, see also, (A preliminary injunction is only provisional and is not intended as a resolution of the merits of a controverted issue.)
-
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Doyle Giddings, Inc.
920 So. 2d 404
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Smith, supra ; Morgan, supra ; Hunsucker, supra .
- Smith v. Kaye's Food Market 874 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
- Morgan v. Investment Cars Unlimited, Inc. 843 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
-
Rainey v. ENTERGY GULF STATES, INC
840 So. 2d 586
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
as follows: There is no prohibition against a plaintiff amending his petition with leave of court to alter the substance of his demand after filing of answer.
-
Cohen v. Brookshire Bros. Inc.
819 So. 2d 429
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
of Opelousas, Strouse v. M & M Properties, 32,792 (La.App.
- Berrigan v. Deutsch, Kerrigan & Stiles, LLP 806 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
-
Mooers v. Sosa
798 So. 2d 200
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
Art. 1154; Kold, Inc. v. H & A Gas Purchasing, Inc., 91-1086 (La.App.
- Strouse v. M & M PROPERTIES 753 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
-
Houston Industries, Inc. v. Fitch
752 So. 2d 974
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Gaines, supra; Spencer-Wallington, Inc. v. Service Merchandise, Inc., (La.App.
-
Gaines v. Bruscato
712 So. 2d 552
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Spencer-Wallington, Inc. v. Service Merchandise, Inc., (La.App.
- Hughes v. Muckelroy 700 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
- Walker v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets 671 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
- Ridge Oak Development, Inc. v. Murphy 641 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
-
Barnco Intern., Inc. v. Arkla, Inc.
628 So. 2d 162
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized the partial demise of the doctrine of election of remedies in Louisiana, stating: Accordingly, the common law election of remedies doctrine is inconsistent with the modern procedural concepts embodied in our present code of civil procedure, although it may have h
-
Kold, Inc. v. H & a Gas Purchasing, Inc.
609 So. 2d 328
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Beard v. Circle K, Inc., (La.App.
- Andrepont v. Lake Charles Harbor and Terminal Dist. 602 So. 2d 704 La. 1992
- Grant v. Politz 575 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- Beard v. Circle K, Inc. 554 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-
Petroleum Treaters Inc. v. Houma Land & Offshore Co.
545 So. 2d 1300
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co., (La.
-
General Elec. Co. v. Dugas
526 So. 2d 854
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
with the court noting that a policy of liberal amendment is contemplated under both Louisiana and Federal law.
-
Gitschlag v. US Home Corp.
506 So. 2d 1236
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
the court found: There is no prohibition against a plaintiff amending his petition with leave of court to alter the substance of his demand *1240 after filing of answer.
-
Royer v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.
502 So. 2d 232
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
for the proposition that amendments are favored under the Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure as well as the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure upon which our article 1151 is largely based.
- Rico v. Vangundy 461 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
- Duhon v. Slickline, Inc. 449 So. 2d 1147 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
- Gunter v. Plauche 439 So. 2d 437 La. 1983
- Carter v. Safeco Ins. Co. 435 So. 2d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- Gremillion v. Rapides Parish Police Jury 430 So. 2d 1362 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- Broussard v. Breaux 412 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
-
BLAISE PARKING, ETC. v. Project Square 221
409 So. 2d 691
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
of City of Opelousas, in which the court held that a plaintiff who sues for specific enforcement of a contract is not prohibited from amending his petition to sue for damages for defendant's breach.