DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State, in Interest of Giangrosso, 395 So. 2d 709.

23 citing documents.

  • State in the Interest of H.B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    1 Cir. 1980), affirmed, (La.
  • State Of Louisiana in the Interest of D.W. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
    App. 1st Cir. 1980), affd, ( La.
  • State ex rel. D.J.S. 255 So. 3d 1177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    1 Cir. 1980), affirmed , (La.
  • State in the Interest of D.J.S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    1 Cir. 1980), affirmed, (La.
  • In re State 240 So. 3d 945 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    App. 1st Cir. 1980), affirmed , (La.
  • State ex rel. J.J. 196 So. 3d 110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    1st Cir.1980), affirmed, this court stated: Uln juvenile proceedings, the scope of review of this court extends to both law and fact.
  • State ex rel. C.T. 195 So. 3d 70 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    1 Cir.1980), affirmed, this court stated: In juvenile proceedings, the scope of review of this court extends to both law *74 and fact.
  • State v. R.W. 721 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    In State in Interest of Giangrosso, (1981), 4 the Louisiana Supreme Court found that the court improperly exempted the investigating officers from a sequestration order, but found that the error was harmless.
  • In Interest of Lc 696 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    1st Cir.1980), affirmed, this court observed: In juvenile proceedings, the scope of review of this court extends to both law and fact.
  • State ex rel. S.T. 677 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    Writs were granted by the Louisiana Supreme Court and in State in Interest of Giangrosso, the court applied the standard found in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State in Interest of Rlk 666 So. 2d 427 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    art. 883; State in the Interest of Giangrosso
  • State v. Bland 558 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Brown 552 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State ex rel. Gordon 543 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    art. 73; State in the Interest of Giangrosso
  • State, in Interest of Wilkerson 542 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    See State in Interest of Giangrosso
  • State ex rel. McPipe 542 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    art. 73; State in the Interest of Giangrosso
  • State v. Garcia 519 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    See State in Interest of Giangrosso
  • State v. Thomas 470 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State in Interest of Redd 445 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    10(B); State in Interest of Giangrosso, State in the Interest of Cason, State in the Interest of Thomas
  • State, in Interest of Racine 433 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Writs were granted by the Louisiana Supreme Court and in State in Interest of Giangrosso, the judgment of this court was affirmed with the following language: We conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found, from the evidence adduced at trial, proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • Ortego v. Pratt-Farnsworth, Inc. 423 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    In State in the Interest of Giangrosso, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the party opposing sequestration and who wants to exempt a witness has the burden of showing exemption from sequestration would serve the “interest of justice.” (p. 712) We believe, as the Trial Judge believed, that the defendants have shown that *782 permitting Mr. Coo
  • State in Interest of Williams 421 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • State in Interest of Pigott 413 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    1st Cir. 1980), affirmed