Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bond v. Commercial Union Assur. Co., 407 So. 2d 401.

109 citing documents.

Penelope Catzen, Sophia Vorhoff, And Harry Vorhoff v. Tashonty Toney, Esurance Insurance Company, And State Auto Property And … La. 2023
Rocco LaTorre v. Lucas Cade Hunter, Enterprise Rent A Car and Mercury Indemnity Company of America La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Trae Thibodeaux v. Steven Arvie, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 1980), aff’d, (“It is clear from the jurisprudence that a left turning motorist bears a higher standard of care than ordinary”; standard described as “a high degree of care,” “higher duty of care,” “exceptional duty of care,” and “considerable in degree”).
Thibodeaux v. Arvie 226 So. 3d 1229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 1980), aff'd, ("It is clear from the jurisprudence that a left turning motorist bears a higher standard of care than ordinary”; standard described as "a high degree of care,” "higher duty of care,” "exceptional duty of care,” and "considerable in degree”).
Olympia Minerals, LLC v. H. S. Resources, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Olympia Minerals, LLC v. HS Resources, Inc. 162 So. 3d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Bernard v. Ellis 76 So. 3d 69 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
Co., (on rehearing) (noting that because the principal elements of UM coverage are prescribed by law, "[a]ny clause in an insurance contract in derogation of the mandatory requirements set forth in the statute is invalid insofar as it conflicts with the law.") [2] *75 Insurers are entitled to limit their lia
In Re Richmond 996 So. 2d 282 La. 2008
Smith v. Rocks 957 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Gedward, supra; (on rehearing); Jones v. Crane Co., 26,781 (La.
Roy Weldon v. Monica Curry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Weldon v. Curry 899 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Champagne v. Ward 893 So. 2d 773 La. 2005
Hoefly v. Government Employees Ins.
Dunn v. Terry 821 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
art. 1826; , 408 n. 1 (La.1981).
O'NEAL v. Blackwell 818 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
-08 (La.1981)(on rehearing).
Alpaugh ex rel. Alpaugh v. Continental Insurance Co. 776 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Prudhomme v. Imperial Fire & Cas.
Meyerex rel. Meyer v. Gulotta 747 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Gedward v. Sonnier 728 So. 2d 1265 La. 1999
Carbon v. Allstate Ins. Co. 719 So. 2d 437 La. 1998
Fair Grounds Corp. v. ADT SEC. SYSTEMS 719 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Gedward v. Sonnier 713 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Prudhomme v. Imperial Fire & Cas.
Carbon v. Allstate Ins. Co. 701 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
-408 (La.1981)(on rehearing).
Chapman v. Poirrier 689 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Trautman v. Poor 685 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Sambola v. Dwyer 684 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Nathan 673 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Co., on rehearing, wherein the court applied the general laws of subrogation to allow a claim by a UM carrier against an uninsured tortfeasor for funds paid to its insured.
Principal Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Progressive United Corp. 674 So. 2d 1073 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Roberts v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 662 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Co., Carona v. State Farm Ins.
Travelers Insurance Co. v. Joseph 649 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
-411 (La.1981); (La.App.
Alessi v. Belanger 644 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Segura v. Frank 630 So. 2d 714 La. 1994
Co., (on rehearing) ("We conclude that upon payment an insurer, pursuant to a subrogation agreement contained in its policy, becomes conventionally subrogated to its insured's right against the uninsured tortfeasor").
Barker v. Whittington 628 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Co., (on rehearing), for a question of material fact to exist as to his permanent residence.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Manuel 608 So. 2d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Egros v. Pempton 606 So. 2d 780 La. 1992
Strickland v. State Farm Ins. Companies 607 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Therefore, I -08 (La.1981) is controlling.
Hull v. Louisiana Indem. 606 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Co., and Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins.
Wambsgans v. Liberty Lloyds Ins. Co. 595 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Co., ] supra, at 409-411.
Willett v. NATIONAL FIRE & MAR. INS. CO. 594 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Egros v. Pempton 588 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Henson v. Safeco Ins. Companies 585 So. 2d 534 La. 1991
Martin v. Willis 584 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
the court held a 31-year-old, divorced man who worked offshore remained a resident of his father's household in Alexandria, even though he maintained a separate apartment in Lafayette.
Provident Life and Acc. Ins. v. Turner 582 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Boyer v. Trinity Universal Ins. Co. 576 So. 2d 444 La. 1991
1827 (regarding conventional subrogation) and 1829 (regarding legal subrogation); *448
Brister v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. 562 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
3rd Cir.1978) and Bond vs. Commercial Union Assurance Co., on remand (La.App.
Edwards v. Dairyland Insurance Co. 560 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
22:1406(D)(4); ” 425 So.2d at 227 .
Sharp v. Daigre 555 So. 2d 1361 La. 1990
Niemann ; Pace v. Cage, *1364
Serpas v. Ridley 556 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
Co., which held that payment under a subrogation agreement in its policy allows an insurer to become subrogated to the insured's right against the uninsured tortfeasor.
Rutkowski v. State 550 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Hoefly v. Government Employees Insurance Co., 418 So.2d at 578 ; (on rehearing).
Sharp v. Daigre 545 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Jones v. Henry 542 So. 2d 507 La. 1989
Lee v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co. 540 So. 2d 1083 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989