Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kent v. Gulf States Utilities Co., 418 So. 2d 493.

296 citing documents.

Linda Mouton v. Aaa Cooper Transportation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
stated: In a typical negligence case against the owner of a thing (such as a tree) which is actively involved in the causation of injury, the claimant must prove that something about the thing created an unreasonable risk of injury that resulted in the damag
Mouton v. AAA Cooper Transp. 251 So. 3d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
The Louisiana Supreme *527 Court long ago in Kent v. Gulf States Utilities Co. , , 497 (La.1982), stated: In a typical negligence case against the owner of a thing (such as a tree) which is actively involved in the causation of injury, the claimant must prove that something about the thing created an unreasonable risk of injury that resulted in the damage, that the owner knew or should have known
Boudreaux v. Bollinger Shipyard 197 So. 3d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
the Supreme Court characterized the difference between negligence and strict liability causes of actions for liability for things in our custody: In a typical negligence case against the owner of a thing (such as a tree) which is actively involved in the causation of injury, the claimant must prove tha
Wadick v. General Heating & Air Conditioning, LLC 145 So. 3d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Although “fault” is generally associated with tort *598 liability, 12 the Louisiana Supreme Court 118has explained that “ ‘fault’ is a broader and more comprehensive term than ‘negligence.’ ”
Julie Smalley v. Anthony Ransonet La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Watts v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. 135 So. 3d 53 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Jones v. Buck Kreihs Marine Repair, L.L.C. 122 So. 3d 1181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Cir.1987); and Strickland v. Ambassador, Insurance Co., (La.App.
Tonya Lynn Boudreaux v. R. E. Heidt Construction Co., Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Flowers v. Entergy Corporation 30 So. 3d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Millard P. Dumesnil, III v. Southwest Louisiana Electric Membership Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Dumesnil v. Southwest Louisiana Electric Membership Corp. 2 So. 3d 1254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Jerry Ramos v. State of La, Thru the Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
9:2800 was unconstitutional as it conflicted with 6 the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that, a plaintiff pursuing a negligence claim against an owner of a thing causing damage must prove that 1) the thing created an unreasonable risk of injury; 2) damage resulted; 3) the owner knew or should have known of the risk; and that 4) the owner failed to take
Ramos v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 977 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
6 |7 the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that, a plaintiff pursuing a negligence claim against an owner of a thing causing damage must prove that 1) the thing created an unreasonable risk of injury; 2) damage resulted; 3) the owner knew or should have known of the risk; and that 4) the owner failed to take ade
Palermo v. Port of New Orleans 951 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Ronald K. Chavers v. Bright Truck Leasing Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Ross [v. La Costa de Monterville], 502 So.2d [1026,] 1032 [(La.1987)]; n. 5 (La.1982).
Chavers v. Bright Truck Leasing 945 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Ross [ v. La Costa de Monterville ], 502 So.2d [1026,] 1032 [(La.1987)]; , 497 n. 5 (La.1982).
Foley v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc. 946 So. 2d 144 La. 2006
Terri Louise Smith v. Boise Cascade Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
1st Cir. 1980), affirmed, ” Goleman v. Kroger & Co., (La.App.
Palermo v. Port of New Orleans 933 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Giorgio v. Alliance Operating Corp. 921 So. 2d 58 La. 2006
Ross, 502 So.2d at 1032; , 497 n. 5 (La.1982).
Raymond Morgan Allen v. Louis Simon and Allstate Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Such a concept is a form of absolute liability, a remedy unavailable in these circumstances given that theory’s stringent standards for recovery as explained by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Kent v. Gulf States Utilities, Co.
Allen v. Simon 888 So. 2d 1140 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Such a concept is a form of absolute liability, a remedy unavailable in these circumstances given that theory's stringent standards for recovery as explained by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Kent v. Gulf States Utilities, Co.
Pepper v. Triplet 864 So. 2d 181 La. 2004
Conoco, Inc. v. Halter-Calcasieu, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Langlois v. Allied Chemical Corporation, 258 La.
Conoco Inc. v. Halter-Calcasieu LLC 865 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Langlois v. Allied Chemical Corporation, 258 La.
Faulkner v. McCarty Corp. 853 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Hebert v. ANCO Insulation, Inc. 835 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Whitaker v. City of Bossier City 813 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Petre v. State Ex Rel. DOTD 817 So. 2d 1107 La. 2002
Menard v. City of Lafayette 786 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern RR 786 So. 2d 682 La. 2001
Petre v. State Ex Rel. DOTD 775 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Hoffman v. City of New Orleans 771 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Kent v. Gulf *219 States Utilities Co.
Dupree v. City of New Orleans 765 So. 2d 1002 La. 2000
Co., , 1112 n. 7 (La.1990)
Stone v. Hebert 762 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Irion v. State Ex Rel. DOTD 760 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Bailey v. Forest Hill Speedway 759 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Strouse v. M & M PROPERTIES 753 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Trice v. Isaac 759 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
497 *848 (La.1982), (emphasis supplied); Teel v. State, Dept. of Transp.
Ditch v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 745 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. 747 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Co., the supreme court observed as follows with regard to the existence of a duty: In a typical negligence case against the owner of a thing (such as a tree) which is actively involved in the causation of injury, the claimant must prove that something about the thing created an unreasonable risk of injury t
Farbe v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange 746 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Cormier v. THE Ins. Co. 745 So. 2d 1 La. 1999
Hooker v. Super Products Corp. 751 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Jacobs v. City of Bunkie 737 So. 2d 14 La. 1999
Penton v. Schuster 732 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
(emphasis supplied); Teel v. State, Dept. of Transp.
Ledent v. Guaranty Nat. Ins. Co. 723 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Soileau v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV. 724 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Melancon v. City of Lafayette 719 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
: Under traditional negligence concepts, the knowledge (actual or constructive) gives rise to the duty to take reasonable steps to protect against injurious consequences resulting from *701 the risk, and no responsibility is placed on the owner who acted reasonably but nevertheless failed to discover tha
Jones v. Hawkins 708 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by