Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kent v. Gulf States Utilities Co., 418 So. 2d 493.

296 citing documents.

Richard v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 702 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Whigham v. Boyd 700 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Tyler v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc. 696 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Grant v. Allstate Ins. Co. 696 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
McAllister v. Coats 691 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Grant v. Allstate Insurance Co. 688 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Boguille v. Chambers 685 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Bartlett v. Browning-Ferris Industries 683 So. 2d 1319 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Kent v. Gulf States Utilities Co., [ (La.
Teel v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVELOPMENT 681 So. 2d 340 La. 1996
Dorthlon v. ST. FRANCIS MED. CENTER 677 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Rhodes v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 674 So. 2d 239 La. 1996
Rhodes v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 674 So. 2d 239 La. 1996
Hebert v. Southwest La. Elec. Mem. Corp. 667 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Co., Kent v. *1158 Gulf States Utilities Co., (La.
Guzman v. State 664 So. 2d 1343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Carter v. Exide Corp. 661 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Rhodes v. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. 656 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Rhodes v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 656 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Haydel v. Hercules Transport, Inc. 654 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
plaintiffs argue that, because Hercules was in the process of transporting and handling a hazardous material, namely, anhydrous ammonia, defendants are absolutely liable to plaintiffs.
Haydel v. Hercules Transport, Inc. 654 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
7 Kent *413 v. Gulf Staten Utilities Company
Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates, Ltd. 650 So. 2d 712 La. 1995
-98 (La.1982) ("Accordingly, in a strict liability case ...
Touchet v. Estate of Bass 653 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
-29 (La.1989); n. 5 (La.1982).
Davis v. Insurance Co. of North America 652 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Campbell v. DEPTARTMENT OF TRANSP. & DEV. 648 So. 2d 898 La. 1995
Morales v. Davis Bros. Const. Co., Inc. 647 So. 2d 1302 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Olivier v. Boudreaux 649 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Faulkner v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. 645 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
1st Cir.1991); see generally
Salone v. Jefferson Parish Dept. of Water 645 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Jolly v. Otis Elevator Co., supra .
Rich v. Tench Elec. Motor Works, Inc. 642 So. 2d 293 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Bradford v. Louisiana Downs, Inc., (La.App.
Buffinet v. Plaquemines Parish Com'n 645 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Jolly v. Otis Elevator Co., supra .
Meany v. Meany 639 So. 2d 229 La. 1994
Thompson v. Louisiana Dept. of Transp. 639 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
DeRouen v. Audirsch 639 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Matherne v. Somme 638 So. 2d 437 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Manuel v. Wal-Mart Stores 640 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Fontenot v. Fontenot 635 So. 2d 219 La. 1994
Ziegel v. South Central Bell 635 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Hutzler v. Cole 633 So. 2d 1319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Burton v. Conoco Offshore, Inc. 631 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Theriot v. Lasseigne 624 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Hunter v. Dept. of Transp. and Dev. 620 So. 2d 1149 La. 1993
Fontenot v. Fontenot 621 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Doucet v. City of Eunice 620 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
1st Cir.1984), writ denied
Jolly v. Otis Elevator Co. 620 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Limberg v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 622 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
In a strict liability case against the same owner, the claimant is relieved only of proving that the owner knew or should have known of the risk involved.
Blue v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 619 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
in which the court absolved the power company of liability to a workman who was using a long rake which made contact with overhead power lines.
Louisiana Commercial Bank v. GEORGIA INTERNATIONAL LIFE INS. CO. 618 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Guild v. City of New Orleans 617 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Since the major difference between a typical strict liability case and a negligence case is that the plaintiff in a negligence case is required to prove that the defendant knew or should have known of the risk involved, the elements of proof in strict liability cases and the elements of proof in negligence cases against a public body are virtually the same.
Weaver v. Valley Elec. Membership Corp. 615 So. 2d 1375 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Cockerham v. Atlantic Richfield Co. 615 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Thumfart v. Lombard 613 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Doughty, supra at 463 , 464 ( , 497 n. 5 (La.