Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kent v. Gulf States Utilities Co., 418 So. 2d 493.

296 citing documents.

Davis v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 612 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Williams v. General Motors Corp. 607 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Smith v. State Through Dept. of Public Safety 620 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Harwell v. Haspel-Kansas Investments 598 So. 2d 1284 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Chatelain v. *1287 Project Square 221, (La.App.
Bealer v. National Tea Co. 597 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Hartford Acc. & Indem. v. Illinois Cent. 598 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Bergeron v. Blake Drilling & Workover Co., Inc. 599 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Scamardo v. New Orleans Stevedoring Co. 595 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
McCullough v. Regional Transit Authority 593 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Lafont v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. 593 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Allen v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 589 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Putman v. Gulf States Utilities 588 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Hood v. State Through DOTD 587 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Orleans Parish School Bd. v. City of New Orleans 585 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Socorro v. City of New Orleans 579 So. 2d 931 La. 1991
Home Insurance Co. v. National Tea Co. 577 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Williams v. Exxon Corporation, 541 So.2d at 913 .
Labit v. Tangipahoa Parish Council 581 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Perez v. State, Through DOTD 578 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Doughty v. Insured Lloyds Ins. Co. 576 So. 2d 461 La. 1991
Ross, 502 So.2d at 1032 ; , 497 n. 5 (La.1982).
Stovall v. Shell Oil Co. 577 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Valet v. City of Hammond 577 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Since this type of notice is the only distinction between negligence under article 2315 and strict liability under article 2317; see, the elements necessary to impose liability upon a public entity based on negligence or strict liability are now the same.
Spivey v. Super Valu 575 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Oster v. Department of Transportation & Development, State of Louisiana 572 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
In combination, the two articles “impose[] responsibility on a person not only when his negligence causes damage, but also when the person has a legal relationship with a person, a thing or an activity which causes damage.”
Le v. Johnstown Properties 572 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
App. 1st Cir.1984), writ denied
Dobson v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 567 So. 2d 569 La. 1990
where we held injury caused by contacting uninsulated power lines did not fall within the ambit of strict or absolute liability, but should be controlled by negligence principles: [T]he transmission of electricity over isolated high tension power lines is an everyday occurrence in every parish in this state
Coates v. Nettles 563 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Dawson v. Clark 564 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Dodson v. Webster Parish Police Jury 564 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Morrow v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 562 So. 2d 1082 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Joseph v. Ennis 560 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Sistler v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 558 So. 2d 1106 La. 1990
Washington v. Louisiana Power and Light Co. 555 So. 2d 1350 La. 1990
See also Harper, James & Gray, The Law of Torts § 16.9, n. 8
Jones v. Williams 557 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Lebleu v. Southern Silica of Louisiana 554 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Lirette v. State Farm Insurance Co. 554 So. 2d 1365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
(citing Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., as a traditional negligence case); Marshall v. Beno Truck Equipment, Inc., (La.App.
Bell v. State 553 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Lajaunie v. Central Louisiana Elec. Co. 552 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Favorite v. Regional Transit Authority 552 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
illustrates the difference between negligence under art. 2315 and strict liability under art. 2317.
Alford v. Estate of Zanca 552 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Dobson v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 550 So. 2d 1334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Jarvis v. JI Case Co. 551 So. 2d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Addison v. Williams 546 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
and Bianchini v. Humble Pipe Line Company, 480 F.2d 251 (5th Cir.1973).
Levi v. SW La. Elec. Membership Co-Op. 542 So. 2d 1081 La. 1989
Trabeau v. MacK Trucks, Inc. 543 So. 2d 1381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Morris v. Orleans Parish School Board 544 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Hunt v. City Stores, 387 So.2d *443 585 (La.1980).
Jackson v. Quick 543 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Bush v. STATE EX REL. LA. DOTD 542 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Bush v. State ex rel. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development 542 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Buckbee v. United Gas Pipeline Co., Inc. 542 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
at page 498 (La.1982), the Supreme Court stated: "Liability for ultrahazardous activities, on the other hand, involves different considerations *85 than liability under C.C.
Perron v. Ambassador Ins. Co. 541 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989