Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kent v. Gulf States Utilities Co., 418 So. 2d 493.

296 citing documents.

Williams v. Exxon Corp. 541 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Carter v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University, supra ; Buchanan v. Tangipahoa *914 Parish Police Jury, (La.App.
Wright v. US Gypsum Co. 538 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Montgomery v. City of New Orleans 537 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
[footnote omitted] -498 (La.1982).
Foster v. Richland Parish General Hospital 535 So. 2d 1202 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Boyer v. Seal 534 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
the court distinguished the theories of negligence and strict liability.
Gardner v. Campbell 532 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Coleman v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 535 So. 2d 955 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
a combination of unusual factors combined to cause the accident.
Washington v. Louisiana Power and Light 532 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
the Louisiana Supreme court held that a utility company is not absolutely liable for the electrocution of persons coming into contact with overhead electrical wires because: "...
Manasco v. Poplus 530 So. 2d 548 La. 1988
Marziale v. Maney 529 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Pritchard v. Safeco Ins. Co. 529 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Watson v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 529 So. 2d 427 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Michel v. Ascension Parish Police Jury 524 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Callender v. City of New Orleans 524 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Levi v. Southwest Louisiana Electric Membership Cooperative 524 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
LeBleu v. Dynamic Indus. Constructors, Inc. 526 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
the Court distinguished a cause of action in strict liability from one in negligence as follows: In a typical negligence case against the owner of a thing (such as a tree) which is actively involved in the causation of injury, the claimant must prove that something about the thing created an unreasonable ri
Dixon v. NORTHEAST LOUISIANA POWER CO-OP. 524 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Wall v. Alleman 519 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Dill v. DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. 522 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Efferson v. State, Through T. and Dev., (La.App.
Guillory v. CONOCO, INC., CONTINENTAL OIL COMPANY 521 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
as activities which can cause injuries to others even when conducted with the greatest prudence and care.
Young v. Royal Jones & Associates 521 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Waters v. McDaniel Recreation Center 521 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
1st Cir.1984), writ denied
Annis v. Shapiro 517 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Justice Lemmon, in distinguishing liability based on LSA-C.
McNeely v. National Hot Rod Ass'n 520 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Silliker v. St. Landry Police Jury 520 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Cashio v. DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVELOPMENT 518 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Creppel v. Louisiana Power and Light Co. 514 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
the court specifically rejected a suggestion that utility companies be subjected to absolute liability and applied the principles of negligence, assessing liability under a duty-risk analysis.
Caminita v. New Orleans Stevedoring Co. 513 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
“Louisiana law places in the ultra-hazardous category activities that ‘can cause injury to others, even when conducted with the greatest prudence and care.’ Kent v. Gulf States Utilities Co., La.1982, .” Hawkins, 766 F.2d at 907 .
Madden v. Saik 511 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Thibodeaux v. Morein 511 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Burge v. City of Hammond 509 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Howard v. Allstate Ins. Co. 510 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Kyle v. City of Bogalusa 506 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
6 DOTD's duty to travelers is to keep the highways and their shoulders in a reasonably safe condition.
Davis v. Material Delivery Service, Inc. 506 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Barbin on Behalf of Barbin v. State 506 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Honore v. Lane 506 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
The only difference between a case under article 2315 (negligence) and a case under article 2317 (strict liability) is that under the strict liability theory the claimant “is relieved only of proving that the owner knew or should have known of the risk involved.” (La.
Crochet v. Pritchard 509 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Mouton v. Southern Pacific Transp. Co. 509 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Kent v. Gulf *483 State Utilities Co. [sic], (La.
Savic v. Assurance Co. of America 509 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Chatelain v. PROJECT SQUARE 505 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Hines v. Dept. of Transp. & Development 503 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Explained Mims v. Bradford 503 So. 2d 1083 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
"In a strict liability case ...
Ross v. La Coste De Monterville 502 So. 2d 1026 La. 1987
Hunt v. City Stores, Inc.
Blair v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 502 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
See Kent v. Gulf States Utilities Co., [ ], supra; Efferson v. Louisiana, Department of Transportation and Development [ (La.App.
Deville v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 498 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Holmes v. State, Through Department of Highways, (La.App.
Gallagher v. Favrot 499 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., (La.
Johnson v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV. 497 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Frazee v. Gulf States Utilities Co. 498 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Kent v. Gulf States Utilities *53 Company
Roberson v. Huggins 498 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Ponthier v. City of New Orleans 496 So. 2d 1050 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986