Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Strickland, 398 So. 2d 1062.

67 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Demon'tay Deon Dunbar La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State v. Garrick, 03- 0137, p. 5 (La.4/14/04), (per curiam); (La.
State of Louisiana v. Terrence Armstrong A/K/A Terrance Armstrong A/K/A Dugga La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Jimmie J Jenkins La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Jamal Christopher Lacon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Garrick, 03–0137, p. 5 (La.4/14/04), (per curiam)
State of Louisiana v. Raven Lamar Wiltz La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Garrick, 03–0137, p. 5 (La.4/14/04), (per curiam)
State of Louisiana v. Nathaniel McCoy, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Sanders, 93-0001, p. 14 (La.11/30/94), ()
State v. McCoy 219 So. 3d 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Sanders, 93- 0001, p. 14 (La.11/30/94), ()
State v. Billizone 215 So. 3d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. William Shupp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Shupp 185 So. 3d 900 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Garrick, 03-0137, p. 5 (La.4/14/04), (per curiam)
State v. Johnson 182 So. 3d 378 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Bailey 152 So. 3d 1056 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Wilson, 27,889 (La.App.2d Cir.4/8/96), , .
State of Louisiana v. Davin Ryan Hanks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Sanders, 93–0001, p. 14 (La.11/30/94), ()
State v. Howard 106 So. 3d 1038 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
P. art. 729.3; State v. Bobo, 46,225 (La.App.
State v. Taylor 97 So. 3d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Ganick, 03-0137, p. 5 (La.4/14/04), (per curiam); 2n Even a discovery violation involving the State’s failure to disclose exculpatory evidence does not require reversal under the Due Process Clause “unless the nondisclosure was so serious that there is a reasonable probability that the suppressed evidence would have produced a different verdict.” Stri
State v. Carter 84 So. 3d 499 La. 2012
State v. Bobo 77 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Paul Denby La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
“Generally, photographs are admissible in evidence when they are shown to have been accurately taken, to be a correct representation of the subject in controversy, and when they shed light upon the matter before the court.”
State v. Denby 58 So. 3d 1096 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“Generally, photographs are admissible in evidence when they are shown to have been accurately taken, to be a correct representation of the subject in controversy, and when they shed light upon the matter before the court.”
State ex rel. D.R. 51 So. 3d 844 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
The Louisiana Supreme Court has held that, in the absence of such procedures, “the question of whether the trial judge decided the defendant’s guilt on the basis of an incorrect appreciation of the applicable legal principles is not determinable.” Reeves, supra
State of Louisiana v. Bacardny Wayne George La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
8 “Generally, photographs are admissible in evidence when they are shown to have been accurately taken, to be a correct representation of the subject in controversy, and when they shed light upon the matter before the court.”
State v. George 19 So. 3d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
|fl“Generally, photographs are admissible in evidence when they are shown to have been accurately taken, to be a correct representation of the subject in controversy, and when they shed light upon the matter before the court.”
State v. Blank 955 So. 2d 90 La. 2007
State v. Sanders, 93-0001, p. 14 (La.11/30/94), ( )
State v. Fowler 940 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Garrick, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/14/04)
State v. Johnson 917 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Garrick, 03-0137 (La.4/14/04), ( per curiam )
State v. Garrick 870 So. 2d 990 La. 2004
State v. James 849 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Jones 814 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Lee 787 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Lee 778 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Carter 772 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Hoffman 768 So. 2d 542 La. 2000
State v. Langley 711 So. 2d 651 La. 1998
Prieur, 277 So.2d at 128
State v. Rhodes 688 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Page 680 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Ellis 677 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Wilson 672 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Busby 653 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
State v. Strickland, supra [, ]; cert.
State v. Sanders 648 So. 2d 1272 La. 1994
State v. McPherson 630 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Renney 586 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Collins 584 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Young 532 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Collins 535 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Brady 524 So. 2d 1356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State in Interest of Rowland 509 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Robertson 509 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Robertson 509 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Breaux 504 So. 2d 1011 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
We note that where the bill of information *1013 was in error, a correction of the error apparently was permitted to be made orally in open court ( ).
State v. Helaire 496 So. 2d 1322 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986