Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hathaway, 411 So. 2d 1074.

112 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. K.B. La. 2025
App. 4 Cir. 1993) ( (La.
State of Louisiana v. Tristen J. Lamons La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana v. Kari Shisler & Joseph Dyczewski La. 2020
State v. Hathaway , , 1080 (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Kari Shisler & Joseph Dyczewski La. 2020
State v. Hathaway , , 1080 (La.
State v. Magee 243 So. 3d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Joshua X. Griffin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Griffin 217 So. 3d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Moultrie 182 So. 3d 1017 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Robertson 168 So. 3d 451 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Robert Lee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Lee 124 So. 3d 1282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Lewis 126 So. 3d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Howard 120 So. 3d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Patrick Paul George La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Defendant also argues that under state jurisprudence, ―police cannot create street encounters.‖ We again note a comment by the fifth circuit: In his appellant brief, for the proposition that the police cannot create street encounters without knowledge of suspicious facts and circumstances sufficient to allow them to infringe on a defendant’s right to be free from government interference.
State v. Washington 104 So. 3d 401 La. 2012
State v. Gibson 103 So. 3d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Carter 38 So. 3d 1092 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Wolff 30 So. 3d 897 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 .In his appellant brief, for the proposition that the police cannot create street encounters without knowledge of suspicious facts and circumstances sufficient to allow them to infringe on a defendant’s right to be free from government interference.
State v. Dowell 17 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
State v. Jackson 11 So. 3d 524 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Fournette 989 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Young 988 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. James 975 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith 960 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Hemphill, supra , citing State v. Brisban, supra
State v. Walker 953 So. 2d 786 La. 2007
State v. Warren 949 So. 2d 1215 La. 2007
State v. Hemphill 942 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Marley 945 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
State v. Brumfield 944 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Broadway 920 So. 2d 960 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
1371 , 63 L.Ed.2d 639 (1980)
State v. Ledford 914 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Brisban, XXXX-XXXX (La.2/26/02)
State of Louisiana v. Shane Everet Evans La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Evans 908 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State of Louisiana v. Kenry James Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Lewis 878 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Ceaser 859 So. 2d 639 La. 2003
State v. Wright 850 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Hickerson 838 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Kirk 833 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Jones 832 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Lawrence 817 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Brisban 809 So. 2d 923 La. 2002
State v. Temple 806 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Haywood, 00-1584 (La.App.
State v. Finney 798 So. 2d 1051 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Pounds 789 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Mayberry 791 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Haywood 783 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Julian 785 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Jackson 772 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
police officers received information from a confidential informant who had previously supplied information leading to narcotics arrests and convictions.
Carter v. City of Natchitoches 772 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Exigent circumstances according to our Supreme Court in State v. |4 Hathaway, are exceptional circumstances which, when coupled with probable cause, justify an entry into a protected area that without those exceptional circumstances, would be unlawful.