Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Klar, 400 So. 2d 610.

109 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. James G. Buck La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Donald 115 So. 3d 1138 La. 2013
State v. Williams 53 So. 3d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
See State v. Gant, 93-2895 (La.5/20/94)
State of Louisiana v. Edward D. Gresham La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Taves 846 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. McGrew 769 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
the court concluded that the jury’s factual determinations are entitled to great weight and will not be disturbed unless clearly contrary to the evidence.
Rodriguez v. Deen 759 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Richmond 708 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Martin 647 So. 2d 437 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
*440 State v. Thomas, supra ; (La.App.
State v. Guice 645 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Thomas, supra ; writ denied
State v. Johnson 643 So. 2d 1323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Gant 637 So. 2d 396 La. 1994
State v. Brown 627 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Williams 617 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Hillman 613 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Sparrow 612 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
5th Cir.1984), writ denied
State v. Roy 606 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Fann 597 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
State v. Voorhies 590 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. McCain 583 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Mitchell 580 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Lard 568 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Stanfield 562 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
State v. Kreitz 560 So. 2d 510 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Harlan 556 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Brown 551 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Melbert 546 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Thomas 546 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Speights 546 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Hallal 544 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Holland 544 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Isaac 544 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
State v. Bordelon 538 So. 2d 1087 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Broussard 539 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Sampay 532 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Broussard 532 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Mayes 532 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Love 535 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
3rd Cir.1983), this court first cited Jackson, supra, and then stated: “When there is conflicting testimony as to the factual matters, evaluation of the credibility of the witnesses is within the sound discretion of the trier of fact and his determinations will not be disturbed unless clearly contrary to the evidence.”
State v. Gibson 529 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Hayes 528 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Broussard 527 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Lee 526 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Thompson 525 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Briggs 526 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Bonnett 524 So. 2d 932 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Pierre 524 So. 2d 1289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Hudgins 519 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Rogers 519 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Saltzman 520 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Barnes 520 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987