Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Tri-State Concrete Co., Inc. v. Stephens, 406 So. 2d 205.

34 citing documents.

Pullig Holdings, L.L.C. and Mudd Holdings v. Succession of Eddie Lewis La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
Tri-State Concrete Co., (La.
Rudolph Dempsey, Jr., Elizabeth Dempsey Goodlow, and Millie Hamilton Harris v. Amos Hamilton, Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Tri-State Concrete Co., ( La.
Lazarus Trading Co. v. Unopened Succession of Foster Fuller Washington 201 So. 3d 989 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Frank L. Maxie v. Harmie Maxie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Tri-State Concrete Co. Inc., v. Stephens
Maxie v. Maxie 157 So. 3d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Tri-State Concrete Co. Inc., v. Stephens
James Steven Broussard v. Stutes Farms, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Broussard v. Stutes Farms, LLC 134 So. 3d 226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Mitchell v. Cooper 121 So. 3d 736 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Florence E. Fessler v. Mary A. Brumfield La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
La.Civ.Code art. 810; Tri-State Concrete Co.
Fessler v. Brumfield 37 So. 3d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
La.Civ.Code art. 810; Tri-State Concrete Co.
Booth v. AMBERG 993 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Tri-State Concrete Co., -208 (La.
Cooper v. Buxton 979 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Civ.Code art. 810; Tri-State Concrete Co.
Clarence Lavaughn Cooper, Et Ux. v. Karen Kay Travis Buxton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
La.Civ.Code art. 810; Tri-State Concrete Co.
Moises v. Guzman 904 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
Tri-State Concrete Co., (La.
Entrada Co. v. Unopened Succession 882 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Succession of Eppinette 833 So. 2d 1289 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Ark-La-Miss Timber Co., Inc. v. Wilkins 833 So. 2d 1154 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Marsh Cattle Farms, supra .
Liner v. Lewis 792 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
In Tri-State Concrete Co., the supreme court discussed the differences between a partition in kind and a partition by licitation: The general rule is that partition in kind is favored over partition by licitation.
McNeal v. McNeal 732 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
In Tri-State Concrete Co., -208 (La.1981), the supreme court, relying on La.Civ.Code arts.
Bayou Fleet Partnership v. Saia 745 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Civ.Code art. 807 provides, in pertinent part, that “[n]o one may be compelled to hold a thing in division with another unless the contrary has been provided by law or juridical act.”
Pugh v. NPC Services, Inc. 721 So. 2d 1056 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Marsh Cattle Farms v. Vining 707 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Connally v. Nevils 702 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
In the often cited supreme court opinion of Tri-State Concrete Co., our highest court addressed the subject of judicial partition.
Simpson v. Baker 687 So. 2d 1079 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
art. 811; Tri-State Concrete Co., Inc., v. Stephens, (La.App.
Bulliard v. Bienvenu 663 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
In Tri-State Concrete Co., -208 (La.1981), the supreme court summarized the applicable law as follows: No one can be compelled to hold property with another; a division of a thing held in common may be demanded by the action of partition.
Loupe v. Bybee 570 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
In Tri-State Concrete Co., the Louisiana Supreme Court summarized the applicable law as follows: "The general rule is that partition in kind is favored over partition by licitation.
Munsterman v. Crawford 532 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Tri-State Concrete Company, (La.
Gomes v. Ducote 487 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
He contends he is at a disadvantage due to a tax lien against his equity in the property and relies on Tri-State Concrete Co.
Birdwell v. Jeffery 486 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Succession of Julien v. Julien 482 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Tuttle v. Tuttle 462 So. 2d 175 La. 1985
2nd Cir. 1979); [3] (La.App.
Blanchard v. Fontana 434 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
1364 and 1367.” Tri-State Concrete Company
Tuttle v. Tuttle 430 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
McCullough v. Hart 424 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
Tri-State Concrete Co., Babineaux v. Babineaux, 237 La.