Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hoefly v. Government Employees Ins. Co., 418 So. 2d 575.

225 citing documents.

Eugene Bellard v. American Central Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Roger E. Piper v. Shetler Mutual Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Piper v. Shelter Mutual Ins. Co. 958 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Duncan v. USAA Ins. Co. 950 So. 2d 544 La. 2007
Denton v. Vidrine 951 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Co., as support for his position that an uninsured motorist carrier is a solidary obligor with the tortfeasor.
Denton v. Vidrine 947 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Dark v. Marshall 945 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Co., Woodfield v. Bowman, 1998 WL 382139 (E.D.La.7/9/98).
Mike D. Leger v. Sonnier Exterminating La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Leger v. Sonnier Exterminating Co. 926 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Viada v. a & a MacHine Works, Inc. 914 So. 2d 1113 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Aguilar v. TRANSIT MANAGEMENT OF SE LA. 900 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
Samuel Alexander v. Thiokol Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
In so doing, the supreme court expressly overruled several cases that “perpetuat[ed] the idea, rejected in Hoefly [v. Government Employees Insurance Co., ], that parties cannot be solidarily liable unless their liability is based on the same cause of action, i.e., that obligations arising from tort and contract, or tort and worker’s compensation, cannot be solidary.” Id.
Alexander v. Thiokol Corp. 893 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
In so doing, the supreme court expressly overruled several cases that “perpetuat[ed] the idea, rejected in Hoefly [v. Government Employees Insurance Co., (La.
Champagne v. Ward 893 So. 2d 773 La. 2005
Malbreaugh v. CNA Ins. Co. 887 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Omsi v. Alvin Joe Elliott La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
OMSI v. Elliott 869 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Co., ] ..., this court recently held that a timely suit against the tortfeasor interrupted prescription against the subsequently joined uninsured motorist carrier of the claimant, because the two defendants were solidary obligors.
Amy Chesne v. Mark M. Mayeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Chesne v. Mayeaux 865 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Butler v. Allen 808 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Franklin v. Coleman 793 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Sands v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance 789 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Carpenter v. Carpenter 797 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
LaBorde v. AMERICAN NAT. PROPERTY & CAS. 780 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Co., holds that a tortfeasor and the plaintiff's UM carrier are solidary obligors.
Landry v. Allstate Insurance 768 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Lucero v. Burney Gear Co. 764 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Following significant rulings of the Louisiana Supreme Court, new Article 1797 was added to the Civil Code in the revision of 1984 recognizing that the obligations of the obligors may arise from different sources yet solidarity of the obligation to the obli-gee nevertheless can exist.
Fleming v. American Auto. Ass'n, Inc. 764 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Boullt v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 752 So. 2d 739 La. 1999
Wilfer v. Derosier 732 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Co., -78 (La.1982)(footnote and citations omitted), the Louisiana Supreme Court found tortfeasors and U.M.
Rogers v. Caston 732 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Prevost v. Jobbers Oil Transport Co. 713 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Co., the Louisiana Supreme Court provided the three requisites to find solidary obligations: first, each obligor is obliged to the same thing; second, each obligor may be compelled for the whole payment, and finally, payment by one exonerates the other from its obligation to the creditor.
Ausama v. Frontier Public Coach Tours, Inc. 712 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Co., a plaintiff's UM carrier and the tortfeasor are solidary obligors.
Ballam v. Seibels Bruce Ins. Co. 712 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Constans v. Choctaw Transport, Inc. 712 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Anderson does support Pear's contention, but it is an old case that fails to provide a rationale for reaching such a result, and, more significantly, (La.
Hayden v. Gittens 704 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Co ., Triple E, Gittens, and the UM carrier are solidary obligors.
Dronet v. Safeway Insurance Co. 703 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
New Hampshire Ins. Co. v. Gowen 699 So. 2d 1169 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Bullock v. Homestead Ins. Co. 697 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Osborne v. Ladner 691 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
the Louisiana Supreme Court provided the three requisites to find solidary obligations: first, each obligor is obliged to the same thing; second, each obligor may be compelled for the whole payment, and finally, payment by one exonerates the other from its obligation to the creditor.
Molony v. United Services Auto. Ass'n 683 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
A similar analysis was previously used by the Supreme Court to find solidary liability between plaintiff's uninsured motorist carrier and a (La.
Wilson v. City of Shreveport 682 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Deville v. Allstate Ins. Co. 688 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Haney v. Zurich Ins. Co. 680 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Pine v. Doolittle 677 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Bradley v. Mike Rougee Corp. 676 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Co., to define solidary obligors.
James v. Formosa Plastics Corp. of La. 672 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Co., the Louisiana Supreme Court provided the three requisites to find solidary obligations: first, each defendant is obliged to the same thing; second, each obligor may be compelled for the whole payment, and finally, when payment by one exonerates the other toward the creditor.
Rizer v. American Sur. & Fid. Ins. Co. 669 So. 2d 387 La. 1996
Co., the court of appeal reasoned that solidarity existed because both American Surety and USAA were "obliged to compensate plaintiff for the same damage, i.e., his personal injuries resulting from the March 1990 accident."
Gary v. Camden Fire Ins. Co. 665 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Fontenot v. Henderson 670 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Chevalier v. Bossier 663 So. 2d 70 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
23:1209; citing Hoefly v. Government Employees’ Insurance Company