DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hoefly v. Government Employees Ins. Co., 418 So. 2d 575.

225 citing documents.

  • Roy v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co. 453 So. 2d 564 La. 1984
    wherein we found the tortfeasor and UMI carrier were liable in solido, at least for the purpose of allowing an interruption of prescription.
  • Corona v. State Farm Ins. Co. 444 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    they were liable in solido with the alleged tortfeasors, thus under LA.C.C.
  • Wheelahan v. Eller 446 So. 2d 442 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    Co., may be deemed an obstacle to this view.
  • Fertitta v. Allstate Ins. Co. 439 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    held that tortfeasors and uninsured motorist carriers are solidary obligors as to the injured party, and that payment by one should exonerate the other from the creditor as to the solidary obligation.
  • Roy v. United Services Automobile Ass'n 442 So. 2d 1303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Hoefly v. Government Employee’s Insurance Company, (La.App.
  • Farnsworth v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. 442 So. 2d 1340 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    the Louisiana Supreme Court concluded that the tortfeasor and the uninsured motorist carrier were solidarily liable.
  • Jones v. American Fire-Indem. Ins. Co. 442 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    We note, however, that our Hoefly case was reversed by the supreme court in an opinion reported at in which the court found that the liability of the UM carrier and the tortfeasor was solidary, since they are "obliged to do the same thing."
  • DECDEDUE v. Government Employees Ins. Co. 441 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
    In the trial court and here, GEICO contends, it was liable in solido with the alleged tortfeasor; hence, under La.C.C.
  • Southern American Ins. Co. v. Dobson 441 So. 2d 1185 La. 1983
    Co., Booth v. Fireman's Fund Ins.
  • Maryland v. Fabco Inc. 438 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    the Supreme Court stated that an uninsured motorist carrier is solidarily liable by operation of law with a third-party tortfeasor, finding that each was compelled to repair the same damage, despite the differing sources of their obligations.
  • Dobard v. State Farm Ins. Co. 437 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    Co., the release of one co-debtor in solido without the express reservation against the other resulted in the discharge of State Farm.
  • Probst v. Wroten 433 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
  • Bollinger v. Allstate Insurance Co. 433 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • Stroud v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 429 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    In the opinion of my colleagues, a result different from that reached by this court in Guidroz, supra, and its progeny
  • Samanie v. Bourg 434 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
  • Narcise v. Illinois Cent. R. Co. 427 So. 2d 1192 La. 1983
  • Kelly on Behalf of Kelly v. Templet 428 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Recently, and Matthews v. Insurance Company of North America our Supreme Court stated that an uninsured tortfeasor and a UM carrier are bound in solido to the tort victim, up to the limits of UM coverage.
  • Johnson v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. 425 So. 2d 224 La. 1983
  • Chiasson v. Whitney 427 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
    the Louisiana Supreme Court has held that the law imposes an obligation in solido on the part of the tort feasor and the uninsured motorist carrier, both being obliged to the same thing, repair the damage to the victim.
  • Ragland v. Viator 426 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • Brown v. Southern Farm Bureau Ins. Co. 426 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Kesler v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 424 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    During oral arguments, counsel for appellant requested and we granted additional time for the parties to file supplemental briefs based on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Hoefly v. Government Employees Insur *458 ance Company, et al
  • Allen v. Smith 419 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    In accordance with the recent Supreme Court decision of Hoefly v. Government Employees Insurance Company, et al., we find that timely suit against the alleged tortfeasor, Sylvester Smith, Jr., interrupted prescription as to Royal Indemnity Company, plaintiff’s uninsured motorist carrier.
  • US Fidelity and Guar. Co. v. Safeco Ins. Co. 420 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    2318, 2324, 2091 and 2092; (La.
  • Matthews v. Insurance Co. of North America 418 So. 2d 582 La. 1982
    In Hoefly v. Government Employees Insurance Co., et al., (La.