DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hoefly v. Government Employees Ins. Co., 418 So. 2d 575.

225 citing documents.

  • Sharp v. Daigre 545 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • Jones v. Henry 542 So. 2d 507 La. 1989
    Booth v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., 253 La.
  • Thomas v. Doe 542 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • Guitreau v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 540 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    Co., for its holding that an uninsured motorist carrier and the tortfeasor are solidary obligors; and also, Fertitta v. Allstate Ins.
  • Morvant v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co. 538 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
  • 9 to 5 Fashions, Inc. v. Spurney 538 So. 2d 228 La. 1989
    Co., Prudhomme v. Savant, 150 La.
  • Jones v. Henry 533 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • Bauer v. White 532 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • Babineaux v. Domingue 529 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    We concluded, in Farnsworth , (La.
  • Kellis v. Farber 523 So. 2d 843 La. 1988
  • Pugh v. Gondrella 522 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    Co., Jones v. American Fire-Indemnity Ins.
  • Bosch v. Cummings 520 So. 2d 721 La. 1988
  • Fisher v. Morrison 519 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • Clement v. Trinity Universal Insurance Co. of Kansas 515 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    The Supreme Court agreed and explained that a solidary obligation existed between the tort feasor and the UM insurer, State Farm
  • Roger v. Estate of Moulton 513 So. 2d 1126 La. 1987
  • Lipps v. Bernstein 508 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • Mohr v. Lloyds of London 503 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    Co., Underwriters argues that plaintiff’s voluntary dismissal of her suit against Broussard resulted in the reim-position of prescription as to her claim.
  • Keller v. Amedeo 501 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • Burton v. Foret 498 So. 2d 706 La. 1986
    Co., concluded that a tort victim's uninsured motorist carrier is liable in solido with the tort-feasor.
  • Gales v. Gold Bond Bldg. Products 493 So. 2d 611 La. 1986
  • Moncrief v. Panepinto 489 So. 2d 938 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    the Supreme Court said, at page 576: "An obligation is solidary among debtors when they are obliged to the same thing, so that each may be compelled for the whole, and when payment by one exonerates the other towards the creditor.
  • Marzula v. White 488 So. 2d 1092 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • Perrilloux v. Bowser 483 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    3d Cir.1983), writ denied, which states: the Louisiana Supreme Court concluded that the tortfeasor and the uninsured motorist carrier were solidarily liable.
  • Aetna Ins. Co. v. Naquin 478 So. 2d 1352 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    Co., the supreme court said "An obligation is solidary among debtors when they are obliged to the same thing, so that each may be compelled for the whole, and when payment by one exonerates the other towards the creditor.
  • Marshall v. Beno Truck Equipment, Inc. 481 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • Frazier v. Freeman 481 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    (1982), defendant argued that under the rule of LSA-C.C.
  • Sharp v. Allstate Insurance Co. 479 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Co., Roy v. United Services Auto.
  • Chatman v. Mid America Indem. Co. 479 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    The trial court based its decision in favor of Mid-America on the strength of article 2203 in which our Supreme Court held that a UM carrier and a tortfeasor are, for interruption of prescription purposes, codebtors in solido.
  • Tapia v. Ham 480 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • Overruled Versai Management, Inc. v. Monticello Forest Products Corp. 479 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • Theriot v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 478 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • Migliore v. Traina 474 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • American Grain Ass'n v. Canfield, Burch & Mancuso 471 So. 2d 1125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • Harris v. Guitterez 469 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
    Co., the Supreme Court held that the tortfeasor and the uninsured motorist carrier of the victim are solidarily liable to the victim so that the victim's timely suit against the tortfeasor interrupts prescription as to the insurer.
  • Ashline v. Simon 466 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • Capone v. King 467 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    for the rule that all U.M.
  • Jordan v. Sweeney 467 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Co., and applying La.Civ.
  • Westbrook v. Prince 465 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT DISMISSING HANOVER AS UNDERIN-SURED MOTORIST CARRIER While the record does not contain reasons for judgment
  • Kestler v. Mid-American Indemnity Co. 464 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • Jilek v. Covert 465 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
    Co., see also Fertitta v. Allstate Ins.
  • Fertitta v. Allstate Ins. Co. 462 So. 2d 159 La. 1985
    Art. 2091 McCarron and Allstate argue that the victim's uninsured motorist carrier is solidarily liable with the tortfeasor and that partial payment of the debt by one solidary obligor exonerates the other to that extent toward the creditor.
  • Cole v. Mississippi River Bridge Authority 462 So. 2d 1314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • Cargo v. Green 463 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • Buras v. Carte 463 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    In response thereto appellee filed a wherein our Supreme Court held the underinsured/uninsured carrier to be a solidary obligor with the tortfeasor.
  • Knight v. Soilemisis 461 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Co., decided on June 21, 1982, the tortfeasor and the UM carrier are solidary obligors.
  • Carona v. State Farm Ins. Co. 458 So. 2d 1275 La. 1984
  • Perez v. State Farm Ins. Companies 458 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
    Joiner v. Diamond M. Drilling Company, 688 F.2d 256 (5th Cir.1982)
  • Southeastern Fidelity Insurance Co. v. Porter 457 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    for the proposition that the UM carrier and tort-feasor are obligated in solido to the injured party.
  • Bundy v. Toups 454 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
    3rd Cir.1983), is controlling and that since an uninsured motorist carrier and a tortfeasor are solidary obligors within the meaning of LSA-C.C.
  • Boudreaux v. Government Employees Ins. Co. 454 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Government Employees further contends it is a and that said release effected a release of Government Employees under LSA-C.C.