Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Williams, 418 So. 2d 1317.

15 citing documents.

Succession of Marie Therese Comeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
2nd Cir. 1984); or for error of law, (La.
Succession of Malcom Lamar Murray La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
2nd Cir.1984); or for error of law, and (La.App.
Succession of Francis Stalter La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Although Stalter places much emphasis on the application of both and Succession of Villarrubia, 95-2610 (La.
Succession of Stalter 182 So. 3d 1145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Although Stalter places much emphasis on the application of both and Succession of Villarrubia, 95-2610 (La.9/5/96), , we find that these cases are not applicable, and, thus, would not preclude Littleton from receiving the relief sought.'
Succession of DiLeo 90 So. 3d 488 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Succession of Villarrubia 680 So. 2d 1147 La. 1996
2nd Cir.1984); or for error of law, and (La.
Succession of Villarrubia 662 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
In support of their argument, defendants rely on the cases of
Estate of Sylvester 631 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
2d Cir.1984); or for error of law, and (La.App.
Fleniken v. Allbritton 566 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
STATE, DEPT OF TRANSP. & DEV. v. Clark 548 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Succession of Flowers 532 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
He held that this amounted to a judicial confession and applied the rule of law stated in
Mayfield v. Mayfield 511 So. 2d 1285 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Launey v. Barrouse 509 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Finally, Mrs. Barrouse cites the case of for the proposition that Mrs. Launey is barred from asserting a position in this proceeding that is contrary to the declarations she made in the petition for possession which led to the September 5, 1978 judgement of possession.
Prejean v. First Mississippi Corp. 506 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Averette v. Jordan 457 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984