Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Guidry v. Sline Indus. Painters, Inc., 418 So. 2d 626.

95 citing documents.

James Clifford Arrant v. Graphic Packaging International, Inc. C/W Marvin Jack Barnett, Jr. v. Graphic Packaging International, Inc. … La. 2015
Baker v. TMSEL 970 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
See, e.g., Carruthers v. PPG Industries, Inc., On Rehearing, Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Galeano v. Glazer Aluminum 668 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
See, e.g., Carruthers v. PPG Industries, Inc., On Rehearing, Guidry v. Stine Industrial Painters, Inc.
Hill v. West American Ins. Co. 635 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Quinones v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 634 So. 2d 329 La. 1994
Rothell v. City of Shreveport 626 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Painters, Inc., and Reid, supra at 997 , where the Louisiana Supreme Court embraced the following precepts to govern proof that a worker's heart accident arises out of the employment: (1) If the employee has a previously weakened or diseased heart the employment exertion, stress or strain, acting on the preexisting conditio
Charles v. Travelers Ins. Co. 627 So. 2d 1366 La. 1993
[6] In Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., this court was faced with determining whether an employee's heart attack, which occurred while the employee was at work, arose out of his employment.
Estate of Juneau v. Tudor Construction Co. 621 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Cross v. Travelers Ins. Co. 619 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Johnson v. Petron, Inc. 617 So. 2d 1358 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
OPINION At the time these amendments were enacted, the case of Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., (La.
Canady v. Pynes Chrysler, Inc. 617 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Paper Co., Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., Reid v. Gamb, Inc., (La.
Hunt v. Milton J. Womack, Inc. 616 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
See Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Charles v. Travelers Insurance Co. 615 So. 2d 20 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
asserted the standard for proving by a preponderance of the evidence an employment-related heart attack.
Fullerton v. Monroe Trucking Co. 612 So. 2d 1028 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Painters, Inc., ), or that the heart attack was brought on by work-related extraordinary mental or emotional exertion.
Spinks v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & HUMAN RES. 591 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
1981); Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., Reid v. Gamb, Inc., (La.
Mundy v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources 580 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Ruf v. Darrell DeMoss Photographers 568 So. 2d 1157 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
Of recent vintage, the Louisiana Supreme Court, in Reid v. Gamb, Inc., clarified the question of causation relating to a worker's heart accident by stating: This court in Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., drew upon the rules suggested by Professor Larson, see 1B A. Larson, Workmen's Compensation Law § 38.83 (1980), to formulate precepts to govern proof that a worker's heart accident arises out of the employment: (1) If the employee has a previously weakened or diseased heart the employm
Tucker v. Pony Exp. Courier Corp. 562 So. 2d 897 La. 1990
Paper Co., Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., Reid v. Gamb, Inc., (La.
Tucker v. Pony Express Courier Corp. 554 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
This means that he must present evidence to show that the “work effort, stress or strain in reasonable probability contributed in some degree to the heart attack.” Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Duncan v. South Cent. Bell Telephone 554 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
See Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., (La.App.
Davis v. Townley 552 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Painters, Inc., Johnson v. Hendrix Mfg.
Carruthers v. PPG Industries, Inc. 551 So. 2d 1282 La. 1989
In Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., we determined the correct standard in pre-existing heart disease cases is that the employment-related exertion, stress or strain, acting upon the pre-existing disease, must be greater than that generated in everyday non-employment life.
Carter v. Continental Assurance Co. 554 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Guidry v. Stine Industrial Painters, Inc.
Carruthers v. PPG Industries, Inc. 543 So. 2d 472 La. 1989
In Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., we determined the correct standard in pre-existing heart disease cases is that the employment-related exertion, stress or strain, acting upon the pre-exist-ing disease, must be greater than that generated in everyday non-employment life.
Gaspard v. Dresser Industrial Valve of Dresser Industries, Inc. 542 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Hebert v. Hughes Tool Co. 539 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., involved a 53 year old industrial painter who died after suffering an on-the-job heart attack.
Woolsey v. Cotton Bros. Bakery Co., Inc. 535 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Carruthers v. PPG Industries, Inc. 534 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
This court in Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., (La.
Gobert v. PPG Industries, Inc. 534 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Wooley v. STATE EX REL. DHHR 527 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Wooley v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Human Resources 527 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Hebert v. Harbert International, Inc. 527 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
The jurisprudence also reveals that an accident occurs in the course of one’s employment “when it happens during the time of employment and at a place contemplated by the employment.” Reid, supra, at 996 ; Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Hibbard v. M-N Utilities, Inc. 530 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Reid v. Gamb, Inc., Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
DeGruy v. Pala, Inc. 525 So. 2d 1124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., (La.
Ducote v. Albert 521 So. 2d 399 La. 1988
See also Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Winn v. Thompson-Hayward Chemical Co. 522 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Painters, Inc., a heart attack case.
Lopez v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co. 524 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., Adams v. N.O. P.S., Inc.
Savoy v. Cameron Parish School Bd. 524 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Allison v. State Farm Fire & Cas. 520 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Defendant's second assignment pertaining to causality of the injury as related to his employment, can best be reviewed by the analysis in Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Beckham v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 517 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
2d 903 (1975); Levine v. Mutual Insurance Insurance Company (1974); Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc. (1982).
Reid v. Gamb, Inc. 509 So. 2d 995 La. 1987
Co., Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., Lisonbee v. Chicago Mill & Lbr.
Talley v. Enserch Corp. 508 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
1st Cir.1983) and Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Dupre v. LA RETAILERS ASS'N SELF-INSURERS 509 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Mayeux v. Weiser Security Services, Inc. 508 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Gaspard v. State ex rel. Department of Revenue & Taxation 509 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., at 628 (La.1982).
Palermo v. Reliance Ins. Co. 501 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Barnes v. Crowder Boulevard Self-Service Shell, Inc. 501 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., specifies at pp. 633: For the heart accident to arise out of or be connected with the employment, the exertion stress or strain, acting upon the pre-existing disease, must be of a degree greater than that generated in everyday non-employment life (footnote omitted) The trial judge reasoned: Considering the m
Reid v. Gamb, Inc. 499 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Luneau v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Ins. Co. 493 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Roberts, supra; Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Mayeux v. Commercial Union Insurance Companies 492 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
4th Cir.1975), writ denied, Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., (La.App.