Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sugar, 408 So. 2d 1329.

43 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Eric Dale Mickelson La. 2014
However, where, as here, there has been no attempt to rehabilitate [the prospective juror] subsequent to his remarks expressing his opinion in this area, the challenge for cause should have 23 been granted.”) (citations omitted; emphasis in original); (La.
State of Louisiana v. K.W. T. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Brian K. Malveaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Sugar, supra []; ” In Deboue, the court found improper the prosecutor‟s comment that “„the community is waiting for you to tell them what you‟re going to do.‟” Id.
State v. Stukes 944 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 6/21/00) , , this court refused to grant the defendants a new trial where the prosecutor referred to the defendants as purveyors of drugs and “merchants of death.” noted that the prosecutor’s comments that the jury could not “let this happen in the community” and similar comments “flirted with reversible error,” but the Court reversed the defendant’s conviction on other grounds.
State v. Riley 941 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 6/21/00) , , where this court refused to grant the defendants a new trial where the prosecutor referred to them as purveyors of drugs and "merchants of death;" where the Court noted that the prosecutor's comments that the jury could not "let this happen in the community" and similar comments "flirted with reversible error," but the Court reversed the defendant's conviction on other grounds.
State v. Weary 931 So. 2d 297 La. 2006
State v. Jacobs 789 So. 2d 1280 La. 2001
State v. Forrest 701 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
The prosecutor's remark was improper; when the Court remarked that closing argument should not be a "plebiscite on crime."
State v. Baker 674 So. 2d 1108 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Fairley 645 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Harrison 631 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Ross 623 So. 2d 643 La. 1993
State v. Holmes 619 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Sylvester, supra
State v. Franklin 598 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Vergo 594 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Alexander 575 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Smith 554 So. 2d 676 La. 1989
1986 , 95 L.Ed.2d 826 (1987); cert.
State v. Hall 549 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Kimble 546 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
See Robertson; Edwards; (La.
State v. Deboue 552 So. 2d 355 La. 1989
State v. Eaton 524 So. 2d 1194 La. 1988
State v. Kyles 513 So. 2d 265 La. 1987
State v. Fisher 507 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Jenkins 508 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Brown 496 So. 2d 261 La. 1986
State v. Bates 495 So. 2d 1262 La. 1986
State v. Bowman 491 So. 2d 1380 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Cryer, supra; LSA-C.Cr.P.
State v. Brown 479 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Holbrook 476 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Guarisco 466 So. 2d 1356 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Dufrene 461 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Floyd 458 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
We find that holding applicable to the case before us. Even though the exercise of peremptory challenges is a "substantial" the number of challenges to be made is a procedural matter.
State v. Bailey 457 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Johnson 452 So. 2d 1302 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Williams 447 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Cody 446 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Jackson 439 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
art. 800; State v. Ellwest, 412 So.2d at 595 ; (La.
State v. Gintz 438 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Glaze 439 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Smith 437 So. 2d 802 La. 1983
State v. Griffin 438 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Foster 437 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Eastin 419 So. 2d 933 La. 1982