Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Broussard, 408 So. 2d 909.

18 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana in the Interest of L.J.G. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Joshua Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Lewis 254 So. 3d 1219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State in the Interest of T. J. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State ex rel. T. J. 219 So. 3d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Duhon 674 So. 2d 944 La. 1996
State v. Harris 621 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Jackson 618 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. London 617 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Krummel 593 So. 2d 1368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Rylee 591 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
State v. Norwood 587 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
State v. Sibley 583 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
The Supreme Court of Louisiana, said that a rule to show cause why probation should not be revoked amounts to a summons as the word is used in the article.
State v. Forest 571 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
State v. Morgan 567 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
NOTES [1] the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that such an order attached to the rule to revoke amounts to a summons to appear.
State v. Dassau 534 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Newman 527 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Bruno 470 So. 2d 447 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
the State contended that the issuance of the rule to show cause why the defendant’s probation should not be revoked suspended the running of the probation period.