Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Marshall, 410 So. 2d 1116.

29 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Gene Franklin, Jr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
  • State of Louisiana v. Desmond Kemon Orphey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
  • State of Louisiana v. David Billy Parker, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    the Louisiana Supreme Court refused to countenance replacing jurors who became disqualified or unable to serve after having been sworn with alternate jurors, holding that once sworn, jurors could be discharged only if found to be incompetent.
  • State v. Parker 258 So. 3d 883 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    In State v. Rounsavall , and State v. Buggage , both of which were later expressly overruled in State v. Marshall , the Louisiana Supreme Court refused to countenance replacing jurors who became disqualified or unable to serve after having been sworn with alternate jurors, holding that once sworn, jurors could be discharged only if found to be incompetent.
  • State of Louisiana v. Robyn B. Little Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State of Louisiana v. Carol Noland Saltzman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Davis 129 So. 3d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Saltzman 128 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. HEDGSPETH 974 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Singleton 953 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Thus, when it was shown that a or was "disqualified" (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Justin Charles Singleton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Thus, when it was shown that a or was “disqualified” the replacement of the juror with the alternate has been approved by this court.
  • State of Louisiana v. Marcus Deangelo Tennors La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    the Louisiana Supreme Court refused to countenance replacing jurors who became disqualified or unable to serve after having been sworn with alternate jurors, holding that once sworn, jurors could be discharged only if found to be incompetent.
  • State v. Tennors 923 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    the Louisiana Supreme Court refused to countenance replacing jurors who became disqualified or unable to serve after having been sworn with alternate jurors, holding that once sworn, jurors could be discharged only if found to be incompetent.
  • State v. Packnett 892 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • State of Louisiana v. James R. Skipper La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Thus, when it was shown that a or was “disqualified” the replacement of the juror with the alternate has been approved by this court.
  • State v. Skipper 861 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Thus, when it was shown that a or was “disqualified” the replacement of the juror with the alternate has been approved by this court.
  • State v. Louviere 833 So. 2d 885 La. 2002
  • State v. Derouselle 745 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    the Supreme Court held that the trial court did not err in dismissing a juror on the State’s challenge for cause after the jury had been sworn.
  • State v. Bennett 633 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    the Louisiana Supreme Court held that, prior to the reading of the indictment, a biased juror could be challenged for cause (on a ground not known by the challenging party prior to its acceptance of the juror) and replaced with an alternate juror.
  • State v. Brown 546 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    the Louisiana Supreme Court departed from that reasoning and concluded that a trial court acts properly when it replaces a disqualified juror with an available alternate.
  • State v. Taylor 545 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    which defendant cites in support of his position that removing Mr. Cobb was reversible error
  • State v. Gabriel 542 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Robertson 518 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Sepcich 473 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Brown 467 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Johnson 463 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    as authority for his argument that the trial court may remove jurors who become unable to perform or disqualified from performing their duties.
  • State v. Williams 460 So. 2d 2 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Thus, when it was shown that a or was “disqualified” the replacement of the juror with the alternate has been approved by this court.” See also LSA-C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Fuller 454 So. 2d 119 La. 1984
    Thus, when it was shown that a or was "disqualified" the replacement of the juror with the alternate has been approved by this court.
  • State v. Faulkner 447 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984