Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Simpson, 403 So. 2d 1214.

47 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Marvin K Chest La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
    1993) (counsel was in court to “cover” the docket and appointed the day of trial); (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Brandon S. Butler La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
  • State v. Ventura 195 So. 3d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    1215 n. 2 (La.1981); State v. Brown, 95-0755 (La.App.
  • State v. German 133 So. 3d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • Hooper v. Hero Lands Co. 128 So. 3d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State ex rel. O.W. 160 So. 3d 174 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2013
    “The reasonableness of discretion issue turns upon the circumstances of the particular case.” Porche, supra ().
  • State ex rel. J.T. 94 So. 3d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    “The reasonableness of discretion issue turns upon the circumstances of the particular case.” Porche, supra ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Russell Gene Ware, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Ware 80 So. 3d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Victor 82 So. 3d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Id.., citing Durio, 371 So.2d at 1161 ; (conviction for distribution of heroin reversed when defense counsel was given only three days in which to prepare for trial); (trial court constructively denied defendant right to counsel by appointing new attorney on the day of trial who presented no defense, but only cross-examined the State's witnesses).
  • State of Louisiana v. Darwin Gauthier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Durio, 371 So.2d at 1161; (conviction for distribution of heroin reversed when defense counsel was given only three days in which to prepare for trial); (trial court constructively denied defendant right to counsel by appointing new attorney on the day of trial who presented no defense, but only cross-examined the State’s witnesses).
  • State v. Gauthier 916 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Durio, 371 So.2d at 1161 ; (conviction for distribution of heroin reversed when defense counsel was given only three days in which to prepare for trial); (trial court constructively denied defendant right to counsel by appointing new attorney on the day of trial who presented no defense, but only cross-examined the State's witnesses).
  • State v. Jones 891 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    State v. Bourque, 622 So.2d at 224
  • State v. Johnson 892 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Marshall 843 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Hamilton 834 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    cited by defendant, the public defender moved for a continuance on the morning of trial, stating that he was unaware that his office had been appointed to represent the defendant, and representing that he was unprepared.
  • State v. Howard 805 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    State v. Bourque, 622 So.2d at 224 ; State v. *1256 Simpson, (La.
  • State v. Porter 806 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Porche 780 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Commodore 774 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Sam 761 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Powell 746 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. East 745 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • State v. Snyder 750 So. 2d 832 La. 1999
    State v. Bourque, 622 So.2d at 224 ; (La.
  • State v. Bailey 713 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Strickland 683 So. 2d 218 La. 1996
  • State v. Cockerham 671 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Malinda 663 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Cannon 658 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    State v. Ashley, supra .
  • State v. Addison 644 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    the public defender made a motion for a continuance and specifically informed the court he was not prepared to represent defendant.
  • State v. Smith 632 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Bourque 622 So. 2d 198 La. 1993
  • State v. Knight 611 So. 2d 1381 La. 1993
  • State v. Voiselle 608 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • State v. Williams 605 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Holmes 590 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
  • State v. Greco 575 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Ashley 569 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    2d Cir. 1983), writ denied (La.
  • State v. Martin 543 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    Art. 707 and its progeny, State v. Jones, supra
  • State v. Whittaker 479 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Carney 476 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Armentor 470 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Brooks 452 So. 2d 149 La. 1984
  • State v. Gintz 438 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Clark 437 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Jordan 420 So. 2d 420 La. 1982
  • State v. Champion 412 So. 2d 1048 La. 1982