DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Robicheaux, 412 So. 2d 1313.

141 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. George Joseph La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    With respect to the issue in the present case, advice regarding the Fifth Amendment privilege against compelled self-incrimination has been deemed essential to a valid guilty plea in Louisiana, (on reh’g); except when it is not.
  • State of Louisiana v. Akeeley Keshawn Blade La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
  • State Of Louisiana v. Stanley James Brumfield La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
  • State of Louisiana v. Walter Urena La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    A defendant ordinarily cannot complain of the insufficiency of an indictment after verdict ―unless it is so defective that it does not set forth an identifiable offense against the laws of this state, and inform the defendant of the statutory basis of the offense.‖
  • State v. Urena 161 So. 3d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    A defendant ordinarily cannot complain of the insufficiency of an indictment after verdict “unless it is so defective that it does not set forth an identifiable offense against the laws of this state, and inform the defendant of the statutory basis of the offense.”
  • State v. Gay 136 So. 3d 919 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    For example, advising the defendant he has a “right to remain silent” is insufficient to describe [ 2pthe right against self-incrimination at trial, and advising of a “right to trial” *932 is insufficient to describe the right to a jury trial
  • State of Louisiana v. Gabe McKeel, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. McKeel 153 So. 3d 1029 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Rivera 134 So. 3d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Russell 73 So. 3d 991 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    For example, advising the defendant he has a “right to remain silent” is insufficient to describe the right against self-incrimination at trial, and advising of a “right to trial” is insufficient to describe the right to a jury trial
  • State v. Balsano 11 So. 3d 475 La. 2009
    With respect to the issue in the present case, advice regarding the Fifth Amendment privilege against compelled self-incrimination has been deemed essential to a valid guilty plea in Louisiana, (on reh’g); except when it is not.
  • State of Louisiana v. D. T. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. D.T. 998 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    State v. Devenow, 253 La.
  • State v. DT 998 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    State v. Devenow, 253 La.
  • State v. Parker 963 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Templet 943 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
  • State v. Knott 928 So. 2d 534 La. 2006
    (defendant must object to joint trial with co-defendant or waive the complaint on appeal); , (1970)(objection to joint trial with co-defendant comes too late in motion for new trial.)
  • State v. Lemon 923 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
  • State v. Jackson 916 So. 2d 1015 La. 2005
    (Lemmon, J., dissenting) ("When an appellate court reviews a guilty plea for constitutional validity, the determination depends on the totality of circumstances in each individual case and not on any three-right articulation or other magic word formula.").
  • State v. Caston 914 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Guillard 902 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    State v. Wickem, 99-1261 (La.App.
  • State v. Walker 870 So. 2d 442 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Hampton 865 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Bradley 844 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Conner 833 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Sanborn 831 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Short, 00-866, p. 12 (La.App.
  • State v. Allen 824 So. 2d 344 La. 2002
    art. 487(A); -17 (La.1974); , 1252 n. 2 (La.App.
  • State v. Knight 811 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Wickem, 99-1261 (La.App.
  • State v. Loper 807 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Morrison 795 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Short, 00-866 (La.
  • State v. Foy 808 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Christoff 788 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Brown 788 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Wickem, 99-1261 (La.App.
  • State v. Brown 788 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Gilbert 788 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Short, 00-K-866 (La.App.
  • State v. Knightshed 783 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Wickem, supra .
  • State v. Haywood 783 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Wickem, supra at 968 .
  • State v. Durant 776 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Short 769 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Richardson 770 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Hester 746 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Gaar 746 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    the court vacated an enhanced sentence, since the predicate guilty plea was invalid; the trial judge had stated that the defendant was giving up the right to remain silent but did not say "at trial."
  • State v. Sanders 734 So. 2d 1276 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    State v. Robertson, supra.
  • State v. Lisotta 726 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    noting: Trial judges are granted great discretion in imposing sentences, but even sentences within statutory limits may be excessive under certain circumstances.
  • State v. Guidroz 721 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    noting: Trial judges are granted great discretion in imposing sentences, but even sentences within statutory limits may be excessive under certain circumstances.
  • State v. Hardy 715 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Adams 715 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    art. 858; State v. Whitehead, 29,264 (La.App.
  • State v. Richmond 708 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    noting: Trial judges are granted great discretion in imposing sentences, but even sentences within statutory limits may be excessive under certain circumstances.
  • State v. Tran 709 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    State v. Robertson, supra .
  • State v. Bacuzzi 708 So. 2d 1065 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    noting: Trial judges are granted great discretion in imposing sentences, but even sentences within statutory limits may be excessive under certain circumstances.