Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Robicheaux, 412 So. 2d 1313.

141 citing documents.

State v. Lott 688 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Yarbrough, supra at 511 , and case cited therein; See also, (La.App.
State v. Jackson 668 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Robertson 671 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Cittadino 628 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
State v. Riche 608 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
State v. Benedict 607 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Anseman 607 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
(5th Cir.1985), writ denied
State v. Green 598 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
the Louisiana Supreme Court, commenting on the function of the trial judge in sentencing, stated: "Trial judges are granted great discretion in imposing sentences, but even sentences within statutory limits may be excessive under certain circumstances.
State v. Jackson 597 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
State v. Harmon 594 So. 2d 1054 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
State v. McCoy 586 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Williams 587 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Larson 579 So. 2d 1050 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Laviolette 576 So. 2d 1000 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Conners 577 So. 2d 273 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Watson 575 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Guy 575 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Hunt 573 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. James 573 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Davis 571 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
State v. Carter 570 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
State v. Cologne 562 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
State v. Thomas 556 So. 2d 1349 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
The supreme court analyzed the function of Article 894.1 (1982) as follows: ‘Sentences must be individualized to be compatible with the offenders as well as the offenses.
State v. Collins 557 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
State v. Francis 554 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Franklin 552 So. 2d 1307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Dewhirst 551 So. 2d 70 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
art. 894.1 : “Sentences must be individualized to be compatible with the offenders as well as the offenses.
State v. Guillot 550 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Bailey 549 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Tyler, supra; State v. Studivant, supra.
State v. Bridges 545 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Delaneuville 545 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
State v. Ross 542 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
The defendant cites and relies on State v. Age, on rehearing (La.
State v. Lockett 542 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
State v. Hensley 537 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
State v. Reed 536 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Warren 536 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Studivant 531 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Clark 529 So. 2d 1353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Vinet 529 So. 2d 1334 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. McLean 525 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
In the instant case, defendants received sentences of two years at hard labor for their convictions of theft.
State v. Gilmore 522 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Phelps 520 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
The supreme court analyzed the function of Article 894.1 (1982) as follows: "Sentences must be individualized to be compatible with the offenders as well as the offenses.
State v. Smith 520 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
noting: Trial judges are granted great discretion in imposing sentences, but even sentences within statutory limits may be excessive under certain circumstances.
State v. Lynch 512 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Foster 510 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Rochefort 504 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
In State v. *1118 Robicheaux, the Supreme Court noted: "Sentences must be individualized to be compatible with the offenders as well as the offenses.
State v. Burns 504 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Distinguished State v. Ourso 502 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Lombard 501 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
art. 894.1 as follows: "Trial judges are granted great discretion in imposing sentences, but even sentences within statutory limits may be excessive under certain circumstances * * * Sentences must be individualized to be compatible with the offenders as well as the offenses.
State v. Brooks 501 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986