DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bickham, 404 So. 2d 929.

143 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Augustine La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
    App. 4 Cir. 1/22/14), ( (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Joseph Scott La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
  • State of Louisiana v. Isaac Thomas Gee La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
  • State of Louisiana v. Dajuan Alridge La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
    App. 4 Cir. 9/26/01), (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Travis Boys La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
    App. 4 Cir. 1/22/14), ( (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Orlando Demond Morris Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
    2243, 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977)
  • State of Louisiana v. Nathan Jackson and Tajuan McKnight La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
  • State of Louisiana v. Kerric Brown La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
  • State v. Alridge 249 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    App. 4 Cir. 9/26/01), , 769, citing State v. Bickham
  • State v. Willie 235 So. 3d 1339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State of Louisiana v. Kayla Brignac La. 2017
    Because Article 162 was designed to prevent unconstitutional invasions of privacy interests, the exclusionary rule may be used to prevent violations of these statutory requirements.”); (La.
  • State v. Glenn 162 So. 3d 525 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Tilmon, 38,003 (La.App.2d Cir.04/14/04), , writ denied, 04—2011 (La.12/17/04), .
  • State v. Briley 151 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Gates 145 So. 3d 288 La. 2014
    we held: First, the codal provisions which authorize lawful arrest both with and without a warrant empower officers in close pursuit to leave their territorial jurisdiction for the purpose of effecting an arrest.
  • State v. German 133 So. 3d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Norah 131 So. 3d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Shannon 101 So. 3d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. George Earl White, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Johnson 41 So. 3d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Brown 36 So. 3d 974 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    State v. Weathersby, 09-2407, p. 4 (La.3/12/10), (per curiam); 3
  • State v. Smith 28 So. 3d 1162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Richard v. Lafayette Fire & Police Civil Service Board 8 So. 3d 509 La. 2009
  • State v. Lazard 2 So. 3d 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    (1982); _In determining whether or not reasonable cause exists to temporarily detain a person, the totality of the circumstances, “the whole picture,” must be considered.
  • State v. Wells 991 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Campbell 983 So. 2d 810 La. 2008
    this Court stated: Mental incapacity to proceed exists when, as a result of mental disease or defect, a defendant lacks the capacity to understand the proceedings against him or to assist in his defense.
  • State v. Gauthier 978 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: Mental incapacity to proceed exists when, as a result of mental disease or defect, a defendant lacks the capacity to *1168 understand the proceedings against him or to assist in his defense.
  • State v. Stovall 977 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    the Supreme Court stated as follows: One-on-one confrontations between a suspect and a victim, while not favored by the law, are permissible when justified by the overall circumstances.
  • State v. Taylor 962 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Hopkins 897 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    Kirby v. Illinois, supra ; State v. Moore, 95-116 (La.App.
  • State v. Lewis 885 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    State v. Offray, XXXX-XXXX (La.App.
  • State v. Ashford 878 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    State v. Offray, XXXX-XXXX (La.App.
  • State v. Brown 895 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Tilmon 870 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Ford 867 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    State v. Offray, 2000-0959 (La.App.
  • State v. Harold 861 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    the Supreme Court stated as follows: One-on-one confrontations between a suspect and a victim, while not favored by the law, are permissible when justified by the overall circumstances.
  • State v. Sanchez 859 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Haynes 847 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    *657 (La.1981); State v. Offray, 2000-0959 (La.App.
  • State v. Orange 845 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Thompson 842 So. 2d 330 La. 2003
  • State v. Bridgewater 823 So. 2d 877 La. 2002
  • State v. Dangerfield 816 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Sewell 811 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Black 806 So. 2d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Bell 796 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In West , we wrote: the Supreme Court affirmed the denial of the defendant’s unsubstantiated request for the appointment of a sanity commission.
  • State v. Offray 797 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Carter 779 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Banks 779 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Grubbs, 644 So.2d at 1112
  • State v. Newman 769 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Fish 759 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: Mental incapacity to proceed exists when, as a result of mental disease or defect, a defendant lacks the capacity to understand the proceedings against him or to assist in his defense.
  • State v. Laymon 756 So. 2d 1160 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000