Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ludwig, 423 So. 2d 1073.
-
State of Louisiana v. Sterling Terrel Brown
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Chambers v. Mississippi, supra
-
State Of Louisiana v. Melanie Barnett Curtin
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
See generally G. Pugh, Louisiana Evidence Law, Ch. 5 (1974); (La.
- State Of Louisiana v. Kirby Thomas La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
- State v. Magee 243 So. 3d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- State of Louisiana v. Robert Glen Coleman 188 So. 3d 174 La. 2016
- State v. Harry 11 So. 3d 1244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-
State v. Sartain
2 So. 3d 1132
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Chambers v. Mississippi supra
-
State v. Stukes
944 So. 2d 679
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Chambers v. Mississippi, supra; (La.
- State v. Anders 941 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- State of Louisiana v. Quantell Derell Anders La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
-
State v. Magee
916 So. 2d 1178
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
5 Cir. 2/14/01) , , writ denied, 01-0969 (La.2/8/02), ().
- State v. Motley 895 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
-
State v. Shed
828 So. 2d 124
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Lincoln, 34,-770 (La.App.2d Cir.6/22/01), .
-
State v. Shed
828 So. 2d 124
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Lincoln, 34,770 (La.App.2d Cir.6/22/01), .
- State v. Hutchinson 817 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
- State v. Lincoln 794 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
- State v. Shaw 785 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
-
State v. McBride
773 So. 2d 849
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
The supreme court, stated: Defendant argues that the trial court's exclusion of the evidence violated his federal and state constitutional rights to present a defense and to confront and cross-examine his accusers.
- State v. Webb 764 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
- State v. Talley 748 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
-
State v. Hampton
687 So. 2d 505
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
-80 (La.1982), which states: It is generally accepted that the trial judge should exclude circumstantial evidence, even though logically relevant, if its probative value is outweighed by the risk that its admission will consume too much time, unnecessarily confuse the jury concerning the issues to be determined
-
State v. Van Winkle
658 So. 2d 198
La. 1995
Chambers v. Mississippi, supra ; (La.
- State v. Short 655 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
- State v. Maize 655 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
- State v. Massey 653 So. 2d 1372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
-
Fisher v. River Oaks, Ltd.
635 So. 2d 1209
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Since the evidence "explains a relevant fact" or "supports an inference", plaintiffs assert that it is admissible evidence
- State v. Kennedy 631 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
- State v. Probst 623 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
-
State v. Silguero
616 So. 2d 1346
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, supra; (La.App.
- State v. Bourg 615 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- State v. King 604 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
-
State v. Charles
602 So. 2d 15
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, supra ; (La.App.
- State v. Mosby 595 So. 2d 1135 La. 1992
- In Re RWT Applying for Adoption of JD 594 So. 2d 1383 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
- In re R.W.T. 594 So. 2d 1383 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
- State v. Fleming 593 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- State v. Valenzuela 590 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- State v. Velez 588 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
- State v. Trosclair 584 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
-
State v. Jackson
584 So. 2d 266
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
See G. Pugh, R. Force, G. Rault, K. Triche, Handbook on Louisiana Evidence Law, (1991 Ed.) at 235.
- State v. Mosby 581 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- State v. Magee 576 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- State v. O'Banion 570 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- State v. Carter 570 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
- State v. Lee 569 So. 2d 1038 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
- State v. Volentine 565 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
-
State v. Latiolais
563 So. 2d 469
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Peters, 546 So.2d at 831 .
- State v. Harrison 560 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
- State v. Bland 558 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
- State v. Frederick 554 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989