Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Messer, 408 So. 2d 1354.

80 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Teddy Chester La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State v. Turner 267 So. 3d 1202 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
1984) ; State v. Messer , (La.
State of Louisiana v. Asa Bentley AKA - Asa N. Bentley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Criticized State v. Bentley 182 So. 3d 1269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. David Caleb Fontenot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. Fontenot 160 So. 3d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
243 , 93 L.Ed.2d 168 , (1986)] supra; *619 (La.1984)
State v. Tassin 129 So. 3d 1235 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
State v. Williams 129 So. 3d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Tyrone Mitchell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
the prosecutor, during rebuttal argument, stated: “Lets [sic] send that message loud and clear that the Parish of St.
State v. Mitchell 125 So. 3d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
the prosecutor, during rebuttal argument, stated: “Lets [sic] send that message loud and clear that the Parish of St.
State v. Greenup 123 So. 3d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Slattery 116 So. 3d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4th Cir.1987)] ( (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Mary Henderson Trahan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Criticized State v. Trahan 69 So. 3d 1240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Colvin 65 So. 3d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Robertson 995 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
12 this Court noted that a prosecutor should refrain from argument which tends to divert the jury from its duty to decide the case on the evidence by injecting issues broader than the guilt or innocence of the accused under the controlling law or by making predictions of the consequences of the jury’s verdi
State of Louisiana v. Robin Leblanc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State of Louisiana v. Robert S. Willis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Criticized State v. Willis 915 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Criticized State v. Williams 778 So. 2d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Criticized State v. Hampton 750 So. 2d 867 La. 1999
State v. Smith 740 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Taylor, supra ; State v. Byrne, supra
State v. Davis 726 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Criticized State v. Frost 727 So. 2d 417 La. 1998
State v. Thibodeaux 728 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
435 , 78 L.Ed.2d 367 (1983); (La.
Criticized State v. Wafer 719 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Criticized State v. Tolbert 716 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Shanks 715 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Guillory 715 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
435 , 78 L.Ed.2d 367 (1983)
State v. Smith 687 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Criticized State v. Powell 683 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Criticized State v. Taylor 669 So. 2d 364 La. 1996
State v. Forrest 670 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Francis 665 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Criticized State v. Sanders 648 So. 2d 1272 La. 1994
See, e.g., *1286 Byrne, supra
State v. Wise 644 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Miller 637 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Bourque 622 So. 2d 198 La. 1993
State v. Deal 607 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
State v. Pittman 604 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Washington 597 So. 2d 1084 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
818 , 102 L.Ed.2d 807 (1989); (La.App.
State v. Washington 597 So. 2d 1084 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
818 , 102 L.Ed.2d 807 (1989); (La.App.
State v. Scott 593 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Alexander 575 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Explained State v. Washington 563 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
at 1356 (La.1982); A prosecutor should refrain from argument which tends to divert the jury from its duty to decide the case on the evidence by injecting issues broader than the guilt or innocence of the accused under the controlling law or by making predictions of the consequences of the jury's verdict.
Explained State v. Washington 563 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
at 1356 (La.1982); A prosecutor should refrain from argument which tends to divert the jury from its duty to decide the case on the evidence by injecting issues broader than the guilt or innocence of the accused under the controlling law or by making predictions of the consequences of the jury’s verdict.
State v. Smith 557 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Daliet 557 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
State v. Collins 557 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
State v. Johnson 553 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Art. 894.1; State v. Smith, supra.