DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sherer, 411 So. 2d 1050.

93 citing documents.

  • Overruled State of Louisiana v. McKartney Young La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    Porter [v. Butler, ] and [State v.] Sherer[, ] are inconsistent with this conclusion, they are overruled.
  • Overruled State v. Young 271 So. 3d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    ] Porter [ v. Butler , ] and [ State v. ] Sherer [, ] are inconsistent with this conclusion, they are overruled.
  • State v. Augustine 125 So. 3d 1203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    and held that "[tjhere is no statutory bar to applying the habitual offender law in sentencing for more than one conviction obtained on the same date.” Shaw at 1245 .
  • Overruled State of Louisiana v. Brandon Dale Allen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    To the extent that the opinions in Porter and [State v.] Sherer [] are inconsistent with this conclusion, they are overruled.
  • Overruled State v. Allen 79 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    To the extent that the opinions in Porter and [State v.] Sherer [ ] are inconsistent with this conclusion, they are overruled.
  • Overruled State v. Baylor 998 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    To the extent that the opinions in Porter and [ State v. ] Sherer [, ] are inconsistent with this conclusion, they are overruled.
  • State v. Shaw 969 So. 2d 1233 La. 2007
    are inconsistent with this conclusion, those opinions are expressly overruled.
  • State v. Francois 884 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Mitchell 869 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Martinez 792 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    [State v.]Sherer[ ],, which involved convictions arising out of a single criminal act, should not be applied to limit enhancement of more than one conviction obtained on the same day arising out of separate criminal offenses committed at separate times.
  • State v. Wallace 788 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Hawthorne 772 So. 2d 924 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    and several cases from this circuit, the appellant maintains that he can be multiple billed on only one of his convictions because they were handed down on the same date.
  • State v. Odom 772 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    which held that the defendant could not be found to be a habitual offender on each of the two counts because convictions on more than one count entered on the same date should be treated as one conviction for applying the habitual offender statute, and St
  • State v. Luna 772 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    [ State v. ]Sherer[ ], which involved convictions arising out of a single criminal act, should not be applied to limit enhancement of more than one conviction obtained on the same day arising out of separate criminal offenses committed at separate times.
  • State v. Bates 742 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • State v. Kunzman 741 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Honeyman, supra ; on appeal after remand, (La.App.
  • State Ex Rel. Berry v. State 693 So. 2d 787 La. 1997
  • State ex rel. Berry v. State 693 So. 2d 787 La. 1997
  • State v. Ward 670 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Valentine 668 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    holds that only one of two convictions entered the same day and arising out of a single incident can be used to invoke the habitual offender statute.
  • State v. Abbott 650 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    On August 13, 1990, defendant filed a
  • State v. Abbott 634 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    On August 13, 1990, which held that only one count of a single bill of information may be enhanced pursuant to the Habitual Offender Law.
  • State ex rel. Hyorth v. Shea 629 So. 2d 1156 La. 1993
  • State v. Searcy 621 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Jeter 609 So. 2d 1019 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    on appeal after remand, cert dismissed, 468 U.S. 1205 , 104 S.Ct.
  • State v. Mims 607 So. 2d 549 La. 1992
  • State Ex Rel. Mims v. Butler 601 So. 2d 649 La. 1992
    Regarding the "one day, one conviction" rule, in Porter, this court explained that in a previous case, the court had construed the Jackson rule as standing for the proposition that "convictions on more than one count entered on the same date should be treated as one conviction for purposes of the habitual offender statute, ..."
  • State v. Barnes 597 So. 2d 1109 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    on appeal after remand, State v. Trosclair, supra, at p. 1105 .
  • State v. Parker 593 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Johnson 587 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State ex rel. Ardis v. Smith 584 So. 2d 663 La. 1991
  • State Ex Rel. Porter v. Butler 573 So. 2d 1106 La. 1991
    15:529.1 on each conviction obtained on the same day arising from a single criminal incident and charged in a single bill of information
  • State v. Delaune 572 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Desdunes 576 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Lawrence 572 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    15:529.1) for both offenses violated the so-called "one day, one conviction, rule" (La.
  • State v. Mayeaux 570 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Hatcher 568 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Mims 566 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Honeyman 565 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    on appeal after remand, State v. Trosclair, supra, at p. 1105 .
  • State v. Papillion 556 So. 2d 1331 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Leagea 554 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Parker 552 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State Ex Rel. Alpine v. Butler 549 So. 2d 859 La. 1989
  • State v. Mims 550 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Guillory 544 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Nelson 543 So. 2d 1058 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NUMBER 6 Defendant contends that at the sentencing hearing, appeal after remand
  • State v. Martin 543 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Townley 539 So. 2d 1284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    and the cases cited therein; (La.App.
  • State v. Wells 538 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Norwood 538 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
    the Louisiana Supreme Court held convictions for more than one count entered on the same day should be counted as one conviction for multiple bill purposes.