DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hargrave, 411 So. 2d 1058.

31 citing documents.

  • State v. Taylor 97 So. 3d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    “The circumstances indicating an intent to effect a restraint on the liberty of an accused, rather than the precise timing of the words “ ‘you are under arrest,’ ” determine when an arrest has been made.” (quotations omitted).
  • State v. Rogers 19 So. 3d 487 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
  • State v. Trepagnier 982 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Steven Russell Sedlock La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    The denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal “may be reversed on appeal only if there is no evidence of the crime or an essential element thereof or where the denial is a palpable abuse of discretion.” see also State v. Williams, 34,370 (La.App.
  • State v. Sedlock 882 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    see also State v. Williams, 34,370 (La.App.
  • State v. Williams 781 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Robertson 721 So. 2d 1268 La. 1998
  • State v. Meyers 643 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
  • State, in Interest of Gm 617 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
    held that "[t]he denial of such a motion may be reversed on appeal only if there is no evidence of the crime or an essential element thereof or where the denial is a palpable abuse of discretion.
  • State v. Maxwell 554 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that "The denial of such a motion may be reversed on appeal only if there is no evidence of the crime or an essential element thereof or where the denial is a palpable abuse of discretion."
  • State v. Clark 529 So. 2d 1353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Odom 529 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Garrett 525 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Duron 524 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Williams 497 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Siggers 490 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Benoit 477 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    A motion for judgment of acquittal raises a sufficiency question, and the Supreme Court, held that “[t]he denial of such a motion may be reversed on appeal only if there is no evidence of the crime or an essential element thereof or where the denial is a palpable abuse of discretion.
  • State v. Brown 467 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Aitch 465 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Jenkins 454 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Price 454 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. DeBoue 451 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Ohrberg 448 So. 2d 1316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Griffon 448 So. 2d 1287 La. 1984
  • State v. Mears 445 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Warner 444 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Doucet 443 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Allen 440 So. 2d 1330 La. 1983
  • State v. Collier 438 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Tanner 432 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Hill 431 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    [1] The import of this article was succinctly *874 : "The denial of such a motion may be reversed on appeal only if there is no evidence of the crime or an essential element thereof or where the denial is a palpable abuse of discretion.