Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Green, 418 So. 2d 609.

51 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Scott Robert Swank La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    (a case where the supreme court upheld a concurrent sentence of three years for each victim where the defendant, who had no prior record, killed a seventeen-year-old couple in another vehicle while driving under the influence); (a five-year sentence at hard labo
  • State of Louisiana v. LeDarron Demarion Carter La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
  • State of Louisiana v. Blake Allen Shell -Aka- Blake A. Shell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    (wherein the supreme court affirmed concurrent three-year sentences for a defendant convicted of two counts of negligent homicide in the deaths of two teenagers; testing performed subsequent to the offense revealed a blood alcohol level of .14%).
  • State v. Shell 216 So. 3d 853 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    (wherein the supreme court affirmed concurrent three-year sentences for a defendant convicted of two counts of negligent homicide in the deaths of two teenagers; testing performed subsequent to the offense revealed a blood alcohol level of .14%).
  • State v. Watts 168 So. 3d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Curtis 112 So. 3d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    (eligibility for parole is an ame-lioratory factor which should be considered in gauging whether a sentence is excessive).
  • State of Louisiana v. Jeffery Neal Deville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    cf. Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586, 605, 98 S.Ct.
  • State v. DEVILLE 74 So. 3d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    cf. Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586, 605 , 98 S.Ct.
  • State v. Ellis 67 So. 3d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    “The availability of early release options is generally a relevant consideration in review of sentences for excessiveness.” State v. LeBlanc, 09-1355, p. 11 (La.7/6/10), , and Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586, 605 , 98 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael W. Hood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. LeBlanc 41 So. 3d 1168 La. 2010
  • State v. Shirley 10 So. 3d 224 La. 2009
  • State v. Leader 5 So. 3d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Kotrla 996 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Lastly, wherein the supreme court held that concurrent sentences of three years at hard labor for two counts of negligent homicide, a felony offense which carries a maximum sentence of five years, were not excessive.
  • State of Louisiana v. Marshall M. Kotrla La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Lastly, wherein the supreme court held that concurrent sentences of three years at hard labor for two counts of negligent homicide, a felony offense which carries a maximum sentence of five years, were not excessive.
  • State v. Booker 968 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Cook, supra ; (La.App.
  • State v. Desoto 968 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Jake C. Desoto La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Barrett 756 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , U.S. cert.
  • State v. Skaggs 734 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    See 3 State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
  • State v. Gibson 693 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    the court found that concurrent sentences of three years at hard labor for two counts of negligent homicide, a five-year felony offense, were not excessive, although the defendant was a hardworking single mother with no criminal record.
  • State v. Cook 674 So. 2d 957 La. 1996
  • State v. Beason 653 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Wiley 650 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    Failure to use the type of anti-coagulant or kit on the list of those approved, however, does not require exclusion of the evidence if it can be proved by competent, admissible evidence that the collection device or anticoagulant employed provided equivalent protection of the specimen.” (emphasis added).
  • State v. Edwards 575 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    While a defendant’s chance of parole may serve to lessen the effects of a severe sentence in certain cases, its ameliorative effects cannot be argued to apply to every harsh sentence.
  • State v. Clayton 570 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Weiland 562 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Head 556 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Richardson 550 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Bell 543 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Restrepo 538 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Restrepo 527 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Tyler 524 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Hernandez 506 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Redfearn 504 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    Likewise, the court approved of a jury instruction to the effect that a finding of DWI does not require the finding of criminal negligence.
  • State v. Lombard 501 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Wingerter 498 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Adams 493 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Fairleigh 490 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Taylor 483 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    *252 the blood collection kit utilized was not one of the types set out in the Department’s rules, but an identical kit except that it contained liquid rather than solid anti-coagulant.
  • State v. Tanner 457 So. 2d 1172 La. 1984
  • State v. Williams 458 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
    which posed a somewhat similar balance of mitigating circumstances.
  • State v. Phillips 448 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Tanner 446 So. 2d 370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    he integrity and reliability of the chemical tests including provisions for repair, maintenance, inspection, cleaning, chemical accuracy, and certification;” and demonstrate that it “has strictly complied with the officially promulgated methods, procedures and techniques in the chemical analysis offered as evidence in the case on trial.”
  • State v. Clark 446 So. 2d 293 La. 1984
    in which this court affirmed negligent homicide convictions, although jurors were instructed concerning the presumption of intoxication.
  • State v. Doucet 443 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    the defendant in that case was charged with negligent homicide.
  • State v. Finley 432 So. 2d 243 La. 1983
    State v. Sepulvado, supra .
  • State v. Albert 430 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Tompkins 429 So. 2d 1385 La. 1983
  • State v. Williams 430 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983