Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Day, 414 So. 2d 349.

54 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Daniel White -Aka- Daniel Jackson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Russell Wade Cole La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Indeed, the individualization of a sentence cannot be accomplished “without independently considering the merits of each case.”
State v. Cole 265 So. 3d 1051 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Day , , 352 (La.1982).
State v. Benoit 237 So. 3d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Day , , 350 (La.
State v. Billizone 215 So. 3d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Celestain 146 So. 3d 874 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The Louisiana Supreme Court recognizes that “as a general rule, the fact that a co-defendant has received a more lenient sentence does not necessarily indicate that the penalty imposed on the defendant is excessive.” State v. Tate, 01-1658, p. 26 (La.5/20/03), ().
State v. Sholar 136 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
The Equal Protection *4 Clause only dictates that all defendants be afforded the same sentencing considerations and does not compel any particular result.”
State of Louisiana v. Jamario Kato La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Indeed, the individualization of a sentence cannot be accomplished “without independently considering the merits of each case.”
State v. Kato 157 So. 3d 695 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Indeed, the individualization of a sentence cannot be accomplished “without independently considering the merits of each ease.”
State v. Miller 83 So. 3d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Jones 81 So. 3d 236 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Sanders, supra.
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth K. Prejean La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Indeed, the individualization of a sentence cannot be accomplished “without independently considering the merits of each case.”
State v. Prejean 50 So. 3d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Indeed, the individualization of a sentence cannot be accomplished “without independently considering the merits of each case.”
State v. Ingram 47 So. 3d 1127 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Richardson, 33,272 (La.App.2d Cir.11/01/00), , writ denied, 2000-3295 (La.10/26/01), .
State v. Vidrine 5 So. 3d 1062 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Casey Vidrine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Hailey 953 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Richardson, 33,272 (La.App.
State v. Weary 931 So. 2d 297 La. 2006
State v. Hano 938 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Wilhite 917 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Richardson, 33,272 (La.App.2d Cir.11/1/00), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/26/01), .
State v. Fradieu 851 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Tate 851 So. 2d 921 La. 2003
State v. Taylor 838 So. 2d 729 La. 2003
State v. Calhoun 776 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
State v. Richardson 779 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Adams 715 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Bailey 713 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Bibb, supra ; State v. Baker, supra .
State v. Lavalais 685 So. 2d 1048 La. 1996
State v. Ross 674 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Jackson 629 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Jackson 629 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Sylvas 558 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Franklin 552 So. 2d 1307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Jones 546 So. 2d 1343 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Griffin 540 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Williams 532 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
where the defendant was charged with armed robbery, but the jury found him guilty of simple robbery.
State v. Boudreaux 526 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Fisher 525 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Vogel 524 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Batiste 517 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Fuller 514 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Gilbert 503 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Cortez 503 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Marcantel 502 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Thibodeaux 502 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Lemelle 502 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Hawkins 496 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Raby 487 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Capps 461 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
More particularly, addressed the same issue as the defendant has raised in this specification error.
State v. Walker 454 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984