Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Vaughn, 431 So. 2d 763.

116 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Donald P. Lemoine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
    It argues that the trial court erroneously applied the “same evidence test,” contrary to the supreme court’s holding in State v. Frank, 16-1160 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Monteco K. Frost La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
  • State v. Hardyway 266 So. 3d 503 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
  • State v. Turner 259 So. 3d 1089 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    2072 , 2076, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969) ; State v. Vaughn , , 767 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Skylar Frank La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    the accused was charged with one count of malfeasance in office and one count of theft.
  • State v. Frank 192 So. 3d 888 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State of Louisiana v. Isaac Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 12/30/05), -94, writ denied, 06-314 (La.9/1/06), (), as follows: the Court citing Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 52 S.Ct.
  • State v. Thomas 159 So. 3d 1115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 12/30/05), -94 , writ denied, 06-314 (La.9/1/06), (), as follows: the Court citing Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S.Ct.
  • State v. Morrison 137 So. 3d 736 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    2072, 2076 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969); State v. Warner, 94-2649, p. 4 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Dana Bowles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    9/1/06), (), as follows: the Court citing Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 52 S.Ct.
  • State v. Bowles 123 So. 3d 350 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    3 Cir. 12/30/05), -94 , writ denied, 06-314 (La.9/1/06), (), as follows: the Court citing Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S.Ct.
  • State v. Mills 120 So. 3d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    2072 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969), rev’d on other grounds
  • State v. Holloway 120 So. 3d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    2072, 2076 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969); State v. Warner, 94-2649, p. 4 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Alex P. Papillion La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions the test to be applied to determine whether there are two different offenses or only one, is whether each provision requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not.”
  • State v. Papillion 63 So. 3d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions the test to be applied to determine whether there are two different offenses or only one, is whether each provision requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not.”
  • State of Louisiana v. Daniel L. Pegues La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Pegues 43 So. 3d 1008 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Powell 968 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Jefferson 920 So. 2d 984 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State of Louisiana v. Donald Cogswell, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    the accused was charged with one count of malfeasance in office and one count of theft.
  • State v. Cogswell 918 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    the accused was charged with one count of malfeasance in office and one count of theft.
  • State v. Price 899 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Gibson 867 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    See, e.g., State v. Murray, 2000-1258 (La.9/18/01), ; State v. Harris, 98-2932, p. 6 (La.
  • State v. Gobert 865 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    2072 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969); ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Steven D. Gobert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Bates 859 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Gay, 36,357 (La.
  • State v. Robinson 848 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    citing, North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 , 89 S.Ct.
  • State v. Kelley 836 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Gay 830 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    2072 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969); State v. Coates, 27,287 (La.App.2d Cir.09/27/95), , writ denied, 95-2613 (La.02/28/96), .
  • State v. Gay 830 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    2072 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969); State v. Coates, 27,287 (La.App.2d Cir.09/27/95), , writ denied, 95-2613 (La.02/28/96), .
  • State v. Burt 828 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Davies 813 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. White 799 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Pierce 799 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Jones 799 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    art. 596; State v. Vaughn [ (1983)], supra, and cases cited therein.
  • State v. Allen 793 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    2072 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969); State v. Edward, 98-2932 (La.App.
  • State v. Arnold 801 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Lewis 776 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Harris 761 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Baptiste 759 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Downey 744 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    State v. Watson, 97-0353, p. 4 (La.App.
  • State v. Texada 734 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    2072 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969)
  • State v. Jones 731 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Bailey 713 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Watson 706 So. 2d 1044 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    2072 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969), rev'd on other grounds
  • State v. Cole 702 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    2072 , 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969)
  • State v. Amato 698 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. Guccione 694 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Gaines 688 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Woodberry 686 So. 2d 984 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996