DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Edwards, 420 So. 2d 663.

222 citing documents.

  • State v. Chappell 83 So. 3d 216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Mosley 80 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    See, State v. Bertrand, 2008-2215 (La.3/17/09), ; State v. Divers, 38,524 (La.App.2d Cir.11/23/04),15 *1174 , writ denied, 2004-3186 (La.4/8/05), , cert.
  • State v. Jones 81 So. 3d 236 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Bertrand, 2008-2215 (La.3/17/09)
  • State of Louisiana v. v. L. G. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Finally, we again affirmed the statute‘s constitutionality.
  • State v. Odenbaugh 82 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
  • State of Louisiana v. Tanesha Hardy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Finally, we again affirmed the statute’s constitutionality.
  • State of Louisiana v. Kerry Jerrod Sanders La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    1620 (1972); 7 In a related motion for new trial filed below, the defendant alleged that: [A]t least one of the twelve mandatory jurors in the case, was excused from final deliberation and voting by the jury
  • State v. Hardy 72 So. 3d 1017 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Finally, we again affirmed the statute’s constitutionality.
  • Daigle v. City of Shreveport 78 So. 3d 753 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Sanders 74 So. 3d 284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    1620 , 32 L.Ed.2d 152 (1972); cert.
  • State v. Jacobs 67 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • Explained State v. Barnett 70 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Bertrand, 2008-2215 (La.3/17/09)
  • State of Louisiana v. Kevin Charles Gasaway La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    1/10/03), wherein we noted the following: the supreme court stated: It is well settled that a trial judge is presumed to be impartial.
  • State v. Gasaway 57 So. 3d 597 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 10/31/01), , writ denied, 01-3312 (La.1/10/03), , wherein we noted the following: *601 the supreme court stated: It is well settled that a trial judge is presumed to be impartial.
  • State v. Palmer 57 So. 3d 1099 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    -459 (La.1976); (La.App.
  • Explained State v. Winslow 55 So. 3d 910 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Bertrand, 2008-2215 (La.3/17/09), -742 ; (La.
  • State v. Smith 47 So. 3d 553 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    .7/1/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the defendant’s burden in a motion to recuse a district attorney as follows: In a motion to recuse the district attorney, “the defendant bears the burden of showing by a preponderance of the evidence that the district attorney has a personal interest in conflict with the fair and impartial administration of justice.”
  • State v. DOWL 39 So. 3d 754 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Prejean 24 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. White 22 So. 3d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Simpkins 12 So. 3d 1021 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    after the state has presented its case in chief.”
  • State v. Marshall 6 So. 3d 1051 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Washington, 30,043 (La.App.2d Cir.1/23/98), ; State v. Montz, 92-2073, (La.
  • State v. Bertrand 6 So. 3d 738 La. 2009
    Finally, we again affirmed the statute's constitutionality.
  • State v. Sartain 2 So. 3d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    State v. Montz, 92-2073 (La.App.
  • State v. Malone 998 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Camper 996 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • State v. King 956 So. 2d 562 La. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Dennis Wayne Baker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Supreme Court addressed the defendant’s burden in a motion to recuse a district attorney as follows: In a motion to recuse the district attorney, “the defendant bears the burden of showing by a preponderance of the evidence that the district attorney has a personal interest in conflict with the fair and impartial administration of justice.”
  • State v. Baker 956 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Lathan 953 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    P. art. 404; State v. Woodhead, 03-1036 (La.App.
  • State v. Johnson 940 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Smart 926 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
  • Shaunn Caillier McCorvey v. Derriel Carlton McCorvey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • McCorvey v. McCorvey 916 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Divers 889 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
  • State v. Brewer 880 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Harris, 28,517 (La.App.2d Cir.8/21/96), .
  • State v. Loston 874 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • State v. Washington 866 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • State v. Washington 866 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Woodhead 866 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Favorite 862 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    *217 State v. Jones, 99-798, p. 5 (La.App.
  • State v. Chatman 855 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Cooks 833 So. 2d 1034 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Doleman 835 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    State v. Mims, 97-1500, p. 38 (La.App.
  • State v. Major 829 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Crotwell 818 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Pierce 799 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    the supreme court stated: It is well settled that a trial judge is presumed to be impartial.
  • State v. Davis 786 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Howard 786 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001